HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"resource_uri": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"id": 153992,
"site_url": "https://fragdenstaat.de/dokumente/153992-jo-focal-points-2014-annexes-legpdf/",
"title": "JO Focal Points 2014 Annexes LEG.pdf",
"slug": "jo-focal-points-2014-annexes-legpdf",
"description": "",
"published_at": null,
"num_pages": 28,
"public": true,
"listed": true,
"allow_annotation": false,
"pending": false,
"file_url": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/annexes-of-oplan-jo-focal-points-2014-pad.pdf",
"file_size": 6672495,
"cover_image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p1-small.png",
"page_template": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p{page}-{size}.png",
"outline": "",
"properties": {
"title": "JO Focal Points 2014 Annexes LEG.pdf",
"author": "petrovm",
"_tables": [],
"creator": "PrimoPDF http://www.primopdf.com",
"subject": null,
"producer": "Adobe Acrobat Pro 2020 20 Paper Capture Plug-in",
"_format_webp": true
},
"uid": "79c2b201-ee84-4eb1-9f8d-026369126c94",
"data": {},
"pages_uri": "/api/v1/page/?document=153992",
"original": null,
"foirequest": null,
"publicbody": null,
"last_modified_at": "2022-05-09 12:26:25.463778+00:00",
"pages": [
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 1,
"content": "........ ~ FRONTEX -Reg. No OPERATIONS DIVISION Joint Operations Unit Air Border Sector Annexes of the Operational Plan Joint Operation Focal Points 2014 Air 2014/ABS/03 - European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union www.frontex .europa.eu Rondo ONZ 1, 00 -124 Warsaw , Poland Tel. +48 22 205 95 00 Fax +48 22 205 95 01",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p1-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 2,
"content": "...... ::::::: FRONTEX INDEX ANNEX 1 - DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION 3 1. Introduction 3 2. List of Airports recommended for Activation as Focal Points 5 3. Tasking of Focal Points officers during Focal Points 2014 11 4. Conclusion 11 ANNEX 2 - OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND INDICATORS 14 ANNEX 3 - OPERATIONAL AREA - List of Focal Points 2014 Air 16 ANNEX 4 - DEPLOYED RESOURCES 18 ANNEX 5 - OPERATIONAL BRIEFING AND DEBRIEFING 19 ANNEX 6 - COMMAND AND CONTROL SCHEME 20 ANNEX 7 - JORA 21 ANNEX 8 - CONT ACT DETAILS 27",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p2-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 3,
"content": "::: FRONTEX ANNEX 1 - DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE SITUATION 1. Introduction Joint Operation Focal Points has been created to undertake two specific functions. Firstly, to provide a permanent all year round presence at those airports which are perceived as being the most highly exposed to irregular migration, and secondly to respond to Schengen Member States / SAC requests ' for specific human expertise where they consider that they require it. The aim of this exercise is to undertake an assessment that will seek to identify those airports where a permanent a II year round presence in 2014 is deemed appropriate in order to support these airports in dealing with their level of exposure. The assessment is based mainly on Pulsar data provided by the EU Schengen MS / SAC on a weekly basis (reference period: weeks 1 - 46 of 2013) and on results of current and past Frontex operational activities . The selection of airports was based on several aspects . The following facto rs were taken into account: the main risks identified at the EU/ SAC air border in 2013 (See Risk Matrix in Annex 1) the level of impact of migration pressure as measured according to the levels of impact assessment mechanism described below Other factors, which indicate either a need to support respective national authorities in respect of the management of migration flows, or to obtain relevant information / intelligence for the purpose of risk assessments. In the course of analysis, five categories/ levels of impact of migration pressure at EU/SAC airports were identified according to the best fitting th resholds: very high , high , medium , low and very low . The five categories were defined sepa rately fo r the category \"refusa l of e ntry\" and \"asylum \" on the basis of cluste rs/groups of airports which registered in 2013 the closest/similar numbe rs of persons refused e ntry and seeki ng asylum . In order to combine the impact levels regarding both indicators a nume rical ranking value was provided in respect of each of the indicators . These were designated as fo llows: Very high: 5; High: 4, Medium : 3, Low: 2, Very low: 1. In orde r to obtain the final scori ng for the five impact levels, ranking values regarding indicators \"refusal of e ntry\" and \"asylum \" were combined . It is the case that the larger ai rports with wide global ro ute networks experience the most diversity in terms of the volume of irregula r migrants as well as the type of irregular migration .As it is the intention for Focal Points 2014 to ide ntify and provide information/ intelligence in respect of as many phe nome na as possible, many of these larger airports have been selected to be permane nt Focal Points as they provide the best opportuni ty to e ncounte r the full ra nge of these phe nome na as freque ntly as possible . The dominance of such airports can be realised by the fact that just 4 of these airports produce over 40%of all refusals and asylum applications at the exte rnal Sche ngen/SAC air borde rs. Furthermore , these airports possess by far the majority of direct fli ghts to airports outside of the EU traditionally associated with irregular migration. These airport s Commented [Al] : The non-disclosed text contain detailed information regarding the modus operandi of law also pe rmit easy onward connections from hi gh ris k fli ghts to most othe r EU ai rports. This dispe rsal opportunity means enforcement officials. It contains references to the methods that the risks of irregular migration affect the other EU Member States and SAC. applied by law enforcement officers to perform border control tasks in general and to counter illegal activities in particular. Its publicity would expose the working methods jt should applied those activities which would jeopardize the implementation of ongoing and future operations, and thus facilitate irregular migration and other cross-border crime such as facilitation of irregular immigration , trafficking in human beings and terrorism. Therefore, public security wi ll be affected. In light of the above the text is not disclosed pursuant to the exception laid dow n in the first indent of 1 Heathrow airport London, in the Un ited Kingdom experiences the highest number of refusals of entry and asylum applications of any EU airport. It is Article 4(1 )(a) of Regulation No 1049 / 2001 relating to the i \"\"\"''\"\"'+DL-\"\"'-+'\"-=====\"'--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----{JP~r~ ofc ourse not !J) ot~e':ct~io~n~o~f:_it~h:_ e £p~ub~l:': ic:...'i~nt~e~re::s~t ~as~ re~g~ar~d':. s£p~ub~l:': ic:_:s':_e:' cu:'.n'.~\"tY.Y:_•~ J 3/28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p3-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 4,
"content": "::: FRONTEX belowl_~ - - - - - - - - - - Commented [A2]: The text not disclosed contains sensitive operational information related to the effectiveness of border security. Its disclosure would reveal the existing vulnerabilities which, once public, would be explored by the criminal networks of migrant smuggling and of trafficking of human beings. Thus, the disclosure of such information would harm the public interest as regards public security. In this regard the text is not disclosed pursuant to the exception laid down in the first indent of Article 4(1 )(a) of Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 A comprehensive overview of each of these selected airports and the known threats and pressure is provided below. 4 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p4-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 5,
"content": "::: FRONTEX 2. List of Airports recommended for Activation as Focal [Points~!---~ Commented [A3]: The non-disclosed text contains detailed operational information and intelligence related to individual airports. Its disclosure would reveal the existing vulnerabilities which, once public , would be explored by the 2.1. Amsterdam (AMS) criminal networks of migrant smuggling and of trafficking of human beings. Thus, the disclosure of such information would harm the public interest as regards public security. In this regard the text is not disclosed pu rsuant to the exception laid down in the first indent of Article 4(1 )(a) of Regulation (EC) 1049 / 2001. 2 http: / / en. wikipedia.org /wi ki / Amsterdam_Airport_Schiphol.Note all references to passen ger numbers are sourced from Wikipedia and / or EUR';l-'-=~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5/ 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p5-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 6,
"content": "........ ;::-: FRONTEX 2.2. Brussels (BRU) 2. 3. Frankfur t (FRA) 6 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p6-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 7,
"content": "........ ;::-: FRONTEX 2.4. Madrid (MAD) 2.5. Milan (MXP) 2.6. Paris (COG) - 7 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p7-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 8,
"content": "........ ;::-: FRONTEX 2.7. Paris -Orly (ORY) 2.8. Rome (FCO) 8/28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p8-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 9,
"content": "........ ;::-: FRONTEX 2.9. Stockholm (ARN) 9 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p9-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 10,
"content": "........ ;::-: FRONTEX 2.10. Warsaw (WAW) 2. 11 . Lisbon (LIS) 10 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p10-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 11,
"content": "........ ;::-: FRONTEX -2. 12. Bucharest (OTP) 3. Tasking of Focal Points officers during Focal Points 2014 RAU undertakes a continual monitoring of data during the course of Focal Points deployments. It also undertakes monitoring of data across the wider air borders by way of the Pulsar Weekly data collec t ion. As a result of this RAU is also able to identify sudden changes in modus operandi and emerging t rends. This means that RAU is able to not only identify these phenomena but also to identify what information gaps exist in knowledge associated with these trends . In 2013 Member Stat es agreed that they should be approached on an individual basis via Air Borders Sector to request any specific concen tration on a target wi th or wi thout the use of guest officers or SGOs If RAU identifies the requiremen t t o do so .The option will be provided to the hosting airport to deploy the services of the Guest Officer to concen trate on identification and reporting of incidents linked to the threat/phenomenon as required by RAU in order t o increase knowledge and situational awareness. 4. Conclusion The dual aims of Frontex Focal Points air deployments, on t he one hand providing operational support to Member States and on the other hand attempting to increase knowledge of the habitual traffic and emerging phenomena and modi operandi at the external borders of the EU is not easy to fulfil. 11/ 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p11-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 12,
"content": "::: FRONTEX However, financial restraints mean that at present there does not exist specific funding streams within Focal Points for the separate deployment of human assets to be able to concentrate on achieving just one of these aims on a sustained basis throughout the operational year. jlt is therefore Commented [A4]: The blanked out parts contain detailed information regarding the reporting mechanisms of law enforcement officials. Its disclosure would expose law enforcement officials engaged in the operation and harm the course of future and ongoing operations , and thus facilitate irregular migration. Therefore , public security will be affected. In light of the above , the text is not disclosed pursuant to the exception laid down in the first indent of Article 4(1 )(a) of Regulation No 1049 / 2001 relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security. In this sense Focal Points Air does not seek to provide a total overview of the activity of any specific airports activity. It simply tries to provide some insight into interesting , unusual or typical cases of the airport's traffic. This tactical focused assessment has identified a defined process to identify those airports in the Schengen area which experience the main pressure from irregular migration , or require specific support in terms of activity identified or reporting. 12 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p12-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 13,
"content": "::: FRONTEX Commented [AS]: The non-disclosed text contains detailed operational information and intelligence related to individual airports. Its disclosure would reveal the existing vulnerabilities which, once public , would be explored by the criminal networks of migrant smuggling and of trafficking of human beings. Thus, the disclosure of such information would harm the public interest as regards public security. In this regard the text is not disclosed pursuant to the exception laid down in the first indent of Article 4(1 )(a) of Regulation (EC) 1049 / 2001. 13 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p13-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 14,
"content": "::: FRONTEX ANNEX 2 - OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND INDICATORS The operational aim of the Joint Operation Focal Points Air is to enhance the Integrated Border Management and to increase the operational coordination at the external border of Member States by deploying border guards to activated Focal Point/Coordination Point airports within and outside Europe. Under the umbrella of the Frontex Programme of Work 2014, in the frame of Focal Points Concept this activity is going to contribute to the following corporate goals and prioritized key objectives , as set in the Multi Annual Programme of Work 2014-2017 and PoW 2014: Goal: Development, Key Objective: Add value and capacity to sound EU border management by increasingly conducting operational activities using functional structures and platforms. Goal: Emergency Response, Key Objective: Develop operational contingency modules to shorten the response time in case of emergency situations. Goal: Development, Key Objective: Support the MS Border Management Services by practical cooperation during JOs through exchange of information and intelligence as well as best practices to fight smuggling of persons, trafficking in human beings and cross-border crime. The objectives of the activity are, as follows: Enhance operational cooperation (Frontex & MS/SAC & TC) Support the establishment of permanent structures Identify possible risks and threats Enhance border security This operational activity is expected to deliver the following main benefits: Increased operational response capacity in MSs Increased operational cooperation among MSs and TCs Increased emergency response capacity of Frontex having permanent Focal Point structure established Increased exchange of information via JORA reporting and Frontex analytical products Being an annual activity, this joint operation will offer the possibility to deploy officers throughout the course of the year. Deployed officers wi ll be able to share their experience and expertise with their counterparts at the respective hosting airports. A continuous flow of information between officers, airports, point of contacts and Frontex should provide all the participants with an up -to-date knowledge about the situation and best practice of border control and border management. The deployments during the joint operation will be based on the proposals of Member States and Third Countries to Frontex and /or on risk ana lysis assessme nt . The objectives are meant to be achieved by the following activities: Activity Indicators of achievement Expected output Deployme nt of operational officers Nr of MS /SAC participating to the At least 20 MS/SAC participating to the JO across the EU JO Deployment of EU Nr of MS / SAC participating to the advisers to Third At least 4 MS/ SAC participating to the JO JO Countries 14 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p14-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 15,
"content": "::: FRONTEX Deployment of TC observers to EU Nr of TC participating to the JO At least 4 TC participati ng to the JO MS/SAC Deployment of Nr of SGOs deployed At least 4 SGO deployed during the year SGOs Activate permanent Nr of permanent Focal Points At least 12 permanent Focal Points to be activated activated in course of 2014 Focal Points To fulfil the reporting requirements of Reporting incident related to 80 % of incidents relate to \"Cases of deployed officers \"Cases of interest\"' as defined in interest\" as defined i n the operational the operational plan. plan 4 following the provisions of the operational plan 3 Risk Analysis Unit will provide timely a cleardefinitions of \"Cases of Interest\" for inclusion in the Operational Plan. 4 This figure will not apply at airports where a deployed officer is using specific skills relating to a specific requested capacity need of that airport and whereby the incidents which the officer reports relate to incidents which may not necessarily fall within the remit of \"Cases of Interest\" as defined in the operational plan; e.g. Portuguese speaking officers supporting airports requiring these skills to deal with Brazilian irregular migrants who are refus<,i•'-\"'>U>'-\"\"-=\"\"'=-=as..- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p15-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 16,
"content": "::: FRONTEX ANNEX 3 - OPERATIONAL AREA - List of Focal Points 2014 Air Host Member States Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Fi nland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland Hosting and reporting airports Amsterdam, Arlanda, Athens, Brussels, Budapest, Helsinki, Paris Charles de Gaulle, Dusseldorf, Rome Fiumicino, Frankfurt, Geneva, Helsinki, Lisbon, Madrid, Munich, Milano Malpensa, Bucharest, Prague, Riga, Vienna, Vilnius, Zurich, Warsaw Home Member States (deploying Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, countries) Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland Other entities N/A 16 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p16-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 17,
"content": "........ ::;.: FRONTEX ~ist of Focal Points 2014 Ai~ Commented [A6]: The blanked out parts con t ai n --- information regarding activation type of operational areas . Its disclosure would expose law enforcement officials' patrolling the area and harm the course of future and ongoing operations , and thu s facilitate irregular migration . Therefore , BELGIUM Brussels BRU public security w ill be affected . In li ght of t he above , the text is not disclosed pursuant to the e xception laid down in the f i rst indent of Article 4(1)(a) of Regulat ion No 1049/ 2001 -- GERMANY Frankfurt FRA relati ng to the protection of the public interest as regards public se curity. SPAIN Madrid MAD FRANCE Paris Charles de Gaulle CDG -- FRANCE Paris Orly ORY ITALY Rome FCO ITALY Milan MXP -- SWEDEN Stockholm ARN PORTUGAL Lisbon LI S POLAND Warsaw WAW ROMANIA Bucharest OTP -- SWITZERLAND Ziirich ZRH SWITZERLAND Geneva GVA LITHUANIA Vilnius VNO AUSTRIA Vienna VIE -- C EC REPUBLIC Prague PRG HUNGARY Budapest BUD LATVIA Riga RI FINLAND Helsinki HEL -- SLOVENIA Ljubljana uu GERMANY Munich MUC GERMANY DUsseldorf DUS GREECE Athens ATH - ITALY Bergamo BGY FRANCE Lyon LYN FRANCE Marseille MRS FRANCE Nice NCE 17 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p17-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 18,
"content": "::: FRONTEX ANNEX 4 - DEPLOYED RESOURCES NETHERLANDS FP Amsterdam (AMS) 14-Mar 28-Mar 15.00 NETHERLANDS FP Amsterdam (AMS) 14-Mar 28-Mar 15.00 NETHERLANDS FP Amsterdam (AMS) 14-Mar 28-Mar 15.00 NETHERLANDS FP Amste rdam (AMS) 14-Mar 28-Mar 15.00 NETHERLANDS FP Amsterdam (AMS) 14-Mar 28-Mar 15.00 SWEDEN FP Stockholm (ARN) 26-Mar 28-Apr 34.00 FRANCE FP Paris (CDG) 27-Mar 25-Apr 30.00 NETHERLANDS FP Amsterdam (AMS) 01-Apr 30-Apr 30.00 NETHERLANDS FP Amsterdam (AMS) 01 -Apr 23-Apr 23.00 NETHERLANDS FP Amsterdam (AMS) 01 -Apr 30-Apr 30.00 NETHERLANDS ITALY FP Rome Fiumicino (FCO) 01 -Apr 29-Apr 29 .00 NETHERLANDS FP Amsterdam (AMS) 01 -Apr 30-Apr 30 .00 BELGIUM FP Brussels (BRU) 01-Apr 30-Apr 30.00 SWEDEN FP Stockholm (ARN) 28-Apr 23-May 26.00 SPAIN FP Madrid (MAD) 28-Apr 26-May 29.00 PORTUGAL FP Lisbon (LI S) 01-May 01-Jun 32.00 GERMANY FP Frankfurt (FRA) 05-May 03-Jun 30 .00 LITHUANIA FP Vilnius (VNO) 06-May 05-Jun 31.00 PORTUGAL FP Lisbon (LIS) 06-Ma 04-Jun 30.00 ITALY FP Rome Fiumicino (FCO) 06-Ma 05-Jun 31.00 ITALY FP Milano (MXP 02-Jun 01 -Jul 30 .00 SWITZERLAND FP Geneva (GVA) 03-Jun 27-Jun 25 .00 FINLAND FP Helsinki (HEL 03-Jun 03-Jul 31.00 GERMANY FP DLlsseldorf DUS 03-Jun 26-Jun 24.00 ITALY FP Milano (MXP) 03-Jun 16-Jun 14.00 PORTUGAL FP Lisbon (LIS) 03-Jun 03-Jul 31 .00 ITALY FP Rome Fiumicino (FCO) 03-Jun 27-Jun 25 .00 GERMANY FP Frankfurt (FRA) 15-Jul 06-Au 23 .00 FRANCE FP Paris (CDG) 19-Se 26.00 BELGIUM FP Brussels (BRU) 19-Se 26.00 SPAIN FP Madrid (MAD) 26 .00 NETHERLANDS ROMANIA FP Bucharest (OTP) 26.00 GREECE FP Athens (ATH) 30-Se 30 .00 ITALY FP Rome Fiumicino (FCO) 30 .00 GERMANY FP Frankfurt FRA 30-Se 29.00 GERMANY FP Frankfurt (FRA) 30.00 ITALY FP Rome Fiumicino (FCO) 31 .00 FINLAND FP Helsinki HEL 09-Se 30-Se 22 .00 FRANCE FP Paris (CDG) 29-Sep 28-Oct 30.00 ITALY FP Milano (MXP) 01-Oct 31-Oct 31.00 SPAIN FP Madrid (MAD) 01-Oct 31-Oct 31.00 GERMANY FP Frankfurt (FRA) 01-Oct 30-Oct 30.00 CZECH REPUBLIC FP Prague (PRG) 06-Oct 31-Oct 26.00 ITALY FP Milano (MXP) 07-Oct 30-Oct 24.00 SPAIN FP Madrid (MAD) 08-Oct 07-Nov 31.00 SPAIN FP Madrid (MAD) 01-Nov 30-Nov 30.00 FRANCE FP Paris (CDG) 03-Nov 28-Nov 26 .00 GERMANY FP Munich (FRA) 04-Nov 03-Dec 30.00 18/28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p18-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 19,
"content": "::: FRONTEX ANNEX 5 - OPERATIONAL BRIEFING AND DEBRIEFING 1. Operational briefing During the first days of deployment all participants from MS and observers from Third Countries will receive the Operational Briefing delivered by Frontex and national authorities of the host MS. 1. 1. General briefing delivered by Frontex The General briefing is a part of Operational briefing carried out by Frontex. All participants of the joint operation will be briefed by an Air Border Sector team member at the beginning of their deployment; In exceptional cases, if respective participants are not available for the centralized Operational briefing, the briefing will be delivered on the spot . 1.2. National briefing delivered by host MS and host TC The National briefing is a part of Operational briefing carried out by national authorities of host MS and TC (airport representatives) based on the deployment overviews provided by Joint Operations Unit (JOU). The National briefers (airport representatives) are responsible for carrying out National briefings, based on the Common Briefing Pack, for all participants deployed within JO. The content and the structure of the Common Briefing Pack are provided by TRU. The National briefers should deliver the National briefing at their airport to the guest officers, seconded guest officers and observers from Third Countries during the first day of the deployment National briefer shall: • Deliver briefings as requested by the deployment overviews • Report t o the project manager (TRU) any irregulariti es regarding briefings carri ed out; • Support the development process of training courses , tools and mat eri als, including the implementation process of such acti vit ies; • Prepare Report of National Brief er after each acti vity and submit it t o the proj ect manager (TRU) ; • Assist in preparin g assessments and evaluations of the operational acti vities. 28.11 .2013 Announcement and invitation to MS / SAC for contribu tions Submission of the Lis t of Focal Points 2014 Air t o MS/ SAC for their approval 15.01.2014 Start ing day for MS / SAC t o begin wi t h t he submission of deployment proposals for t he JO Focal Point s Air 2014 to Frontex 27.01.2014 Deadline for MS / SAC t o approve the List of Focal Points 201 4 Air Announcement and invitation to MS / SAC for General Briefing for regular officers and airport 18.02. 2014 re presentat ives - approval of deployment plan 14.03.2014 Local brie finR at Ams t erdam airport - Nuclear Security Summit 25.03.2014 First General Briefine for GO and airport re prese ntat ives (for t he firs t half of 20131 26.03.2014 Start of the JO Announcement and invitation t o MS / SAC and TC fo r contribu tions regarding TC observers and EU 01. 04. 2014 advisers deployments 15. 05.2014 Local Briefings fo r TC observers and EU advisers 15.09.2014 Deployment pro posals fo r Jan uary and February 201 5 - based on budget available C Standard plan for operational briefing and debriefing is available in Handbook . 19 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p19-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 20,
"content": "::: FRONTEX ANNEX 6 - COMMAND AND CONTROL SCHEME l Commented [A7]: The blanked out part contains personal 4. 1. 1. 1. pperational Management and Operational team ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ data. Its disclosure would affect the privacy and integrity of the individual. Therefore, its disclosure is precluded pursuant perational Manager (OM): to the exception laid down in Article 4(1 )(b) of Regulation perational Team (OT) : 1049 / 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, rontex Coordinating Officer (FCO): Council and Commission Documents. perational Analyst (OA) : Pooled Resources: OPERA team Frontex Situation Centre (FSC) o Senior Duty Officer (SDO) o Frontex Support Officer (FSO FSC) o FOSS Service Managers o JORA Service Managers 20 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p20-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 21,
"content": "........ ::;.: FRONTEX ANNEX 7 - JORA 1. µoRA Actors Commented [AS]: The blanked out parts contain the names and contact details of actors participating in Frontex activities. The disclosure of such information would undermine the protection of the privacy and the integrity of Role Name FX/MS Entity E-mail Phone the individuals, in particular in accordance with EU laws regarding the protection of personal data. In this regard those parts are not disclosed pursuant to the exception laid dow n in JORA Frontex FSC Article 4(1 )(b) of Regulation (EC) 1049 / 2001. Administrator / The blanked out parts contain detailed information related to Service means of communication used by law enforcement officials. Management Frontex FSC Their disclosure would lead to possible abusive usage and harm the course of future and ongoing operations, and thus facilitate irregular migration. Therefore, public security will Frontex Access be affected . In light of the above the text is not disclosed Frontex FSC pursuant to the exception laid dow n in the first indent of Manager Article 4(1 )(a) of Regulation No 1049 / 2001 relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security. Delegated Frontex Frontex FSC Access Manager Template Creator Frontex RAU National Access Austria MS Manager National Access MS Belgium Manager National Access Czech MS Manager Republic MS National Access Finland Manager ... National Access MS France Manager National Access MS Greece Manager National Access MS Hungary Manager MS National Access It aly Manager National Access MS Latvia Manager National Access MS Lithuania Manager National Access MS - Netherlands Manager National Access MS Poland Manager 21 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p21-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 22,
"content": "::: FRONTEX National Access .. Portugal MS -- -- Manager National Access MS Romania Manager National Access MS Slovenia Manager National Access MS Spain Manager National Access MS Sweden Manager National Access Manager 111111 Switzerland SAC NOTE: Detailed roles and responsibilites of the different actors are described in the JORA Policy and Process business documentation 22 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p22-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 23,
"content": "::: FRONTEX 2. µoRA Incidents Reporting Structure~ ------------------------~ Commented [A9]: The blanked out parts contain detailed information regarding the reporting mechanisms of law enforcement officials. Its disclosure would expose law enforcement officials engaged in the operation and harm the course of future and ongoing operations, and thus facilitate AUSTRIA irregular migration. Therefore , public security will be affected. In tight of the above, the text is not disclosed pursuant to the exception laid down in the first indent of BELGIUM Article 4(1 )(a) of Regulation No 1049 / 2001 relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security. CZECH REPUBLIC FRANCE GERMANY GREECE HUNGARY ITALY LATVIA LITHUANIA NETHERLANDS POLAND PORTUGAL ROMANIA SLOVENIA SPAIN 23 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p23-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 24,
"content": "........ ;::-: FRONTEX ISWlmER~ND SWEDEN 24 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p24-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 25,
"content": "::: FRONTEX 3. JORA Incident Template Attributes' List General i nformation No Name of attribute Mandatory' Remarks 1 Reporting Unit (automatic) (Set by JORA) 2 Focal Point (automatic) (Set by JORA) 3 Guest Officer Nationality Yes 4 Incident t ype Yes 5 Date of reporting (automatic) (Set by JORA) 6 Detection date Yes 7 Incident number (automatic) (Set by JORA) 8 Modus Operandi Yes 9 Comments No Persons Information 10 Number of people Yes 11 Case Ref . number Yes 12 Nationali ty claimed No 13 Nationality confirmed Yes 14 Gender Yes 15 Individual comments No 16 Travel purpose Yes 17 Role of person Yes 18 Reason for Refu sal Yes 19 Outcome Yes 20 Encountered at Yes 21 Encount ered by Yes 5 Please mark the respective cells under ,,Mandatory\" if you deem that the relevant fiel d should be mandatorily filled by the Incident Reporter. By doing so, th~ddeot Reooctec wilt be comoelled to enter the rnoodatoq1 data to su bmit tbe lnrirle □ t Report to tbe next validation level 25 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p25-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 26,
"content": "::: FRONTEX 22 I Personal Target No Additi onal Information 23 Route information Yes At least one segment of the \"route information\" is mandatory; in case of reporting one segment only, it shall correspond to where detect ion occurred. The attribute \"Route information\" is composed by a sub-set of attribut es : a) General transport type b) From (airport) c) To (airport) d) Ai rline code e) Flight Number f) From (land / sea rou t e) g) To (land / sea / route) h) Date i) Travel agency j) Location of travel agency k) Is detected 24 Person documents (Document abused) No The att ribute \"Person documents\" is composed by a sub-set of attributes: a) Type of document b) Document type- category c) Status d) Forgery type (=document abuse) e) Issuing country f) Issuing date g) Where issued h) Exhibited /concealed i) Found at j) Comments 25 Documents Alerts information No 26 Attachments No (add attribute , as necessary) 26 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p26-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 27,
"content": "::: FRONTEX ANNEX 8 - CONT ACT DETAILS 1. General Authority Address :Email addres Comme nted [AlO]: The blanked out parts contain detailed information related to means of communication used by law enforcement officials. Their disclosure would lead to possible Frontex (HQ) Rondo ONZ 1, 00-124 Warsaw , frontex~frontex.euroga.eu abusive usage and harm the course of future and ongoing Poland operations, and thus facilitate irregular migration. Therefore, public security will be affected. In light of the above the text Frontex Situation Center Rondo ONZ 1, 00-124 Warsaw, is not disclosed pursuant to the exception laid down in the first i ndent of Article 4(1 )(a) of Regulation No 1049/ 2001 Poland relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security. Focal Points Air team Rondo ONZ 1, 00-124 Warsaw , Poland OPERA team Rondo ONZ 1, 00-124 Warsaw , Poland JORA team Rondo ONZ 1, 00-124 Warsaw , Poland FOSS team Rondo ONZ 1, 00-124 Warsaw, Poland 2. [Fronte~ Commented [All]: The blanked out parts contain the names and contact details of ac tors part icipating in Fron tex activities. The disclosure of such i nformation would Role Name Phone number Emai I address undermi ne the protect ion of the privacy and the integrity of the i ndividuals, in particular in accordance wi th EU laws Front ex Coordinat ing Officer regarding the protection of personal data. In t his regard those parts are not disclosed pursuant to t he except ion laid down i n Article 4( 1)(b) of Regulati on (EC) 1049/2001. Operat ional Manager Operat ional Analyst Spokesperson lzabella Cooper +48 667667292 izabella. cooger(!!lfrontex. euroga. eu Press Office r Ewa Moncure +48 785001374 ewa . moncure~front ex .euroga .eu 27 / 28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p27-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/153992/?format=api",
"number": 28,
"content": "::: FRONTEX 3. \\Airport contact lis Commented [A12]: The blanked out part contains personal data. Its disclosure would affect the privacy and integrity of the individual. Therefore, its disclosure is precluded pursuant to the exception laid dow n in Article 4(1 )(b) of Regulation 1049 / 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, l!l!Jlll!lmllll-~~ Council and Commission Documents. Czech Republic Prague The blanked out parts contain detailed information related to Fi nland Helsinki means of communication used by law enforcement officials. France Paris CDG Their disclosure would lead to possible abusive usage and harm the course of future and ongoing operations, and thus France Paris ORY facilitate irregular migration. Therefore, public security will Ger many Diisseldorf be affected. In light of the above the text is not disclosed Germany Diisseldorf I pursuant to the exception laid down in the first indent of Article 4(1 )(a) of Regulation No 1049 / 2001 relating to the Ger many Frankfurt I protection of the public interest as regards public security. Germany Munich Greece Athens Hun ary Budapest Italy Roma Italy Milano Latvia Riga Lithuania Vilnius Nether lands Amsterdam Poland Warsaw Portugal Lisbon Romania Bucharest Spain Madrid Swi tzerland Geneva REMARK: Any changes related to the contact details of the participants in the course of the joint operation do not require the amendment of the Operational Plan. The updated contact details will be available and shared with the participants during implementation phase on a need to know basis. 28/28",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/79/c2/b2/79c2b201ee844eb19f8d026369126c94/page-p28-{size}.png"
}
]
}
