HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"resource_uri": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155443/?format=api",
"id": 155443,
"site_url": "https://fragdenstaat.de/dokumente/155443-justifications-table/",
"title": "Justifications Table",
"slug": "justifications-table",
"description": "",
"published_at": null,
"num_pages": 2,
"public": true,
"listed": true,
"allow_annotation": false,
"pending": false,
"file_url": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/9a/5f/54/9a5f54194a8149bdb8d204a74311235d/justifications-table.pdf",
"file_size": 1240687,
"cover_image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/9a/5f/54/9a5f54194a8149bdb8d204a74311235d/page-p1-small.png",
"page_template": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/9a/5f/54/9a5f54194a8149bdb8d204a74311235d/page-p{page}-{size}.png",
"outline": "",
"properties": {
"title": "",
"author": "",
"_tables": [],
"creator": "Canon iR-ADV C5550 ",
"subject": "",
"producer": "Adobe PSL 1.3e for Canon",
"_format_webp": true
},
"uid": "9a5f5419-4a81-49bd-b8d2-04a74311235d",
"data": {},
"pages_uri": "/api/v1/page/?document=155443",
"original": null,
"foirequest": null,
"publicbody": null,
"last_modified_at": "2022-05-09 14:49:07.233131+00:00",
"pages": [
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155443/?format=api",
"number": 1,
"content": "Legend of justifications\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n0]\n\nThe non-disclosed part contains detailed information regarding the modus operandi of law enforcement officials performing\nModus border control and coast guard duties. Disclosing such information would expose the working methods applied in ongoing and\n1. operandi of future operations, thus obstructing their effectiveness in prevention of cross-border crime and unauthorized border crossings. In\nlaw consequence, it would undermine the protection of the public interest as regards public security and thus, cannot be disclosed\n\nenforcement Pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) first indent of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.\"\n\n(general)\nThe non-disclosed parts contain information regarding the number and profiles of officers deployed or meant to be deployed in\nthe operational area. Disclosing such information would be tantamount to disclosing the weaknesses and strengths of Frontex\n]. Number and operations and pose a risk to their effectiveness. As a result, the course of ongoing and future similar operations would be\nprofile of hampered, ultimately defeating their purpose to counter and prevent cross-border crime and unauthorized border crossings.\nHuman Consequently, the disclosure of such information would undermine the protection of the public interest as regards public security\nResources as laid down Article 4(1)(a) first indent of Regulation (EC) 1049/20012.\n\nThe non-disclosed parts contain information regarding the technical equipment deployed or meant to be deployed in the\noperational area by Frontex and Member States. Disclosing such information would be tantamount to disclosing the exact type\nand capabilities of the equipment and would enable third parties, e.g. by combining this information with other sources, to draw\nconclusions regarding usual positions and movement patterns. This would open way for abuse, as numbers and types of equipment\nNumber and used in previous operations are indicative of similar numbers and types for succeeding years. Releasing such information would\n3. type of thus benefit criminal networks, enabling them to change their modus operandi and, consequently, result in hampering the course\ntechnical of ongoing and future operations of a similar nature. This would ultimately obstruct the purpose of such operations: to counter\nequipment and prevent cross-border crime and unauthorized border crossings. In this light, the disclosure of information regarding the\ntechnical equipment deployed would undermine the protection of the public interest as regards public security within the\n\nmeaning of Article 4(1)(a) first indent of Regulation (EC) No 1049/20013.\nDisclosing the redacted parts would seriousiy undermine internal decision-making processes regarding current and future\n4 Internal activities of Frontex and Member States. The ongoing discussions taking place within Frontex and under its auspices and involving\n\" decision- numerous stakeholders require special protection. Namely, disclosing the redacted parts would reveal negotiation positions of\nmaking the stakeholders, which would erode the mutual trust among all participants. Such information would enable third parties to\ndraw preliminary conclusions and thus, hamper ongoing and future negotiations. As no overriding public interest that is objective\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n' Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (0J L 145, 31.5.2001, p- 43).\n? Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (0J L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43).\n3 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43).",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3507,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/9a/5f/54/9a5f54194a8149bdb8d204a74311235d/page-p1-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155443/?format=api",
"number": 2,
"content": "and general in nature and not indistinguishable from individual or private interests for the release of these documents is\nascertainable in the present case, they cannot be released based on Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/ 2001*.\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nPersonal data The non-disclosed part contains personal data, such as names of individuals and/or characteristic features which could lead to\nthe identification of individuals. The disclosure would undermine the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual, in\nparticular in accordance with European Union legislation regarding the protection of personal data and therefore has to be\nprecluded pursuant to Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.°\n\n \n\n \n\n4 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Cauncil of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43).\n5 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43).",
"width": 2481,
"height": 3507,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/9a/5f/54/9a5f54194a8149bdb8d204a74311235d/page-p2-{size}.png"
}
]
}
