HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"resource_uri": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"id": 155584,
"site_url": "https://fragdenstaat.de/dokumente/155584-the-costs-of-early-stage-cognitive-enhancement-surveillance-of-the-dividual/",
"title": "The costs of early-stage cognitive enhancement - surveillance of the dividual",
"slug": "the-costs-of-early-stage-cognitive-enhancement-surveillance-of-the-dividual",
"description": "",
"published_at": null,
"num_pages": 24,
"public": true,
"listed": true,
"allow_annotation": false,
"pending": false,
"file_url": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/persona.pdf",
"file_size": 4928591,
"cover_image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p1-small.png",
"page_template": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p{page}-{size}.png",
"outline": "",
"properties": {
"title": "The costs of early-stage cognitive enhancement - surveillance of the dividual",
"author": "István Böröcz",
"_tables": [],
"creator": "Nitro Pro",
"subject": null,
"producer": "Nitro Pro 11 (11.0.7.425)",
"_format_webp": true
},
"uid": "e42451e8-c8ed-42e0-b890-42b4fea442ac",
"data": {},
"pages_uri": "/api/v1/page/?document=155584",
"original": null,
"foirequest": null,
"publicbody": null,
"last_modified_at": "2022-05-09 14:50:23.998825+00:00",
"pages": [
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 1,
"content": "PERSONA Privacy, ethical, regulatory and social no- gate crossing point solutions acceptance Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Research Group on Law, Science, Technology & Society (LSTS) Queen Mary University of London (QMUL) The Multimedia and Vision Research Group Warsaw, 14 June 2018 FRONTEX - European Border and Coast Guard Agency Workshop on EU funded border security research projects",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p1-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 2,
"content": "The seven circumstances • quis (who) • quid (what) • quando (when) • ubi (where) • cur (why) • quem ad modum (in what way) • quibus adminiculis (by what means)",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p2-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 3,
"content": "Why? • European Commission identified a need • Call: H2020-SEC-2016-2017-2 • Topic: SEC-18-BES-2017- Acceptance of no gate crossing point solutions • “the intensive use of technologies bear the risk of invading people’s privacy, and the societal and political acceptance of technologies for “no gate solutions” is required prior to their implementation.” • Expected impact: “A method, and metrics, to assess acceptability by the society of the concept of border control processes based on \"no gate crossing point solutions”, and of the various technology components that may be required.”",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p3-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 4,
"content": "Why? (2) • Contribute to the work of • Technology developers • Researchers • Border authorities • LEAs • Policy-makers • Other stakeholders • by fostering proactive thinking in connection with • Privacy, Ethical, Regulatory and SOcial No-gate crossing point solutions Acceptance (PERSONA)",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p4-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 5,
"content": "Why? (3) • PERSONA aims to develop a unified and tailored impact assessment method and to carry out comprehensive evaluations of wide range of contactless crossing point technologies, taking into account ethics, legal and otherwise regulatory requirements, privacy and personal data protection concerns, threats of discrimination and other societal issues. • The established method for assessment will provide robust information for decision-makers in a form of enumeration of potential threats and benefits, possible measures to minimise the former and maximise the latter as well as overall guidelines in order to drive the innovation and deployment of future solutions by both industry and border control authorities.",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p5-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 6,
"content": "Why? (4) benefits overweigh costs • pros • cons • aids to: • bureaucracy • foster informed decision-making • waste of effort • the protection of societal concerns • complexity • forces to reflect • instrumental use • ex ante thinking/early warning system • inward/outward orientation • inward/outward orientation • best-effort obligation • demonstrates accountability • means for the public to have their voice heard",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p6-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 7,
"content": "Who and where? • 10 partners • Belgium, Norway, Italy, Spain, Portugal, United Kingdom, Sweden, Austria, Serbia, Israel • Research: • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) • Institut for Fredsforskning Stiftelse Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) • Queen Mary, University of London (QMUL) • SME: • Cyberethics Lab (CEL) • Industry: • Atos Spain S.A. (ATOS) • INOV Inesc Inovação (INOV) • LEA • Bundesrechenzentrum – Federal Computing Centre (BRZ) • Swedish Police Authority, National Forensic Centre (SPA) • Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Serbia (SMOI) • Ministry of Public Security – Israel National Police (MOPS-INP)",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p7-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 8,
"content": "What? • Analysis of the existing assessment methods • PIA • Art. 8 ECHR • DPIA • Art. 35 GDPR • Art. 27 Directive • EIA • Autonomy, dignity, non-maleficence, beneficence • SIA • Societal acceptance • SIA • Security aspects • RIA • National Facilitation Programme • Registered Traveller Programme • eurodac, dublin, sis, eurosur, etc.",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p8-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 9,
"content": "What? (2) an ideal impact assessment 1. Systematic process 9. Deliberative 2. Considers the relevant societal concerns 10. Accountable 3. Not everything needs it 11. Assessor is independent 4. Uses the appropriate method 12. Simple 5. Includes recommendations 13. Adaptive 6. Constitutes best efforts obligations 14. Inclusive 7. Relies on sufficient knowledge and know-how 15. Receptive 8. Documented 16. Grows in supportive environment",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p9-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 10,
"content": "What? (3) • Developing an appropriate impact assessment framework for border authorities; • Identifying and assessing the impacts of border crossing technologies on the relevant privacy, personal data protection, ethical, legal and other regulatory as well as societal concerns; • Exploring and implementing the views of various categories of stakeholders; • Developing a textbook to assist organizations and LEAs in the assessment of the impacts of border crossing technologies; • Saving-up decision-makers’ financial and human resources through the development of guidelines necessary for the adequate use of impact assessments; • Improving the harmonisation of impact assessment methods across the EU, through the use of uniform materials for carrying out an impact assessment.",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p10-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 11,
"content": "How and by what means? • WP1 – Requirements for Privacy, Ethical, Regulatory and Social No-gate crossing point technology Acceptance (PERSONA) • WP2 – Analysis, selection and preparation of no-gate technologies for assessment • WP3 – Assessment method and orchestration framework development • WP4 – Field deployment of no-gate technologies and acceptance assessment • WP5 – Best practices and communication with stakeholders • WP6 – Dissemination, exploitation and liaison with projects • WP7 – Coordination • WP8 – Ethics requirements",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p11-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 12,
"content": "How and by what means? (2) WP1 • study and analyse existing European regulations and best practises regarding the acceptance of border security solutions; • specify the user requirements and define use cases and user scenarios for the deployment and assessment executed in WP4; • define technical requirements for no-gate border security solutions selected for impact assessment; • identify PERSONA requirements based on user and technical requirements and latest EU regulations; • study and identify potential risks and mitigation controls; • to perform thorough analysis of impacts against defined requirements in order to identify elements which require further treatment and mitigation;",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p12-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 13,
"content": "How and by what means? (3) WP2 • analyse and select the latest and next generation technologies and solutions for no-gate border crossing points • ensure the minimum Technology Readiness Level 5 upon the assessment of the selected methods • tune and setup the latest verification scanners and smart sensors • investigate and setup latest video analytics and data fusion solutions for person, object and abnormal behavior detection • investigate and setup security assessment and decision support systems • prepare system for selected national facilitation programme for assessment • carry on technical validation of selected technologies",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p13-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 14,
"content": "How and by what means? (4) WP2 Technologies to be assessed • Motion detection, based on Passive InfraRed (PIR) or ultra- sonic • Chemical and weather sensor • Inertial sensor, sensor based on gyroscope and/or accelerometer • Water Poisoning, chemical sensor • GPS, mounted on vehicle with I/O interface (e.g. ignition on/off door status) • Body & Luggage Scanner • Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) with chemical sensor on board • Face Recognition sensor • Access control",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p14-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 15,
"content": "How and by what means? (5) WP2 Technologies to be assessed (cont.) • IMSI Catcher, detect IMSI, IMEI and other information of an mobile-phone • Video Management System, system Camera that detect: Abandon Object, Trip Wire, Loitering and LPR • Vehicle & Cargo Scanning, Objects and Counts and Material and Percentages • Flight data, Season and Resource info, airport operation management system • Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (SMGCS) Radar, Object Localization i.e. Surface movement radar (SMR) • DecidEasy: Decision Support System • No-gate crossing point mobile system • National Facilitation Programme • Person trackers based on distinctive region of interest • Image and face recovery",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p15-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 16,
"content": "How and by what means? (6) WP2 PERSONA orchestration framework • Emulate security sensors • Input files, for definition of events in specific time • Several sensor simulators can run at same time • Tool to test the PERSONA applications, that allows • To repeat specific scenarios (stories) • Reproduce complex scenarios (e.g. full Proof of Concept (POC) scenarios) • Simulate dangerous situations (example: explosive detection alarms) • Simulator output events are logged with time stamp • Support PERSONA’s operational training",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p16-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 17,
"content": "How and by what means? (7) WP3 • investigate and design research method for comprehensive acceptance assessment of no-gate border security solutions; • define clear criteria for user perception analysis; • develop a set of questionnaires and metrics for the effective assessment process; • develop an orchestration plan and set guideline for the orchestration framework for the assessment of the diversity of solutions; • develop and deploy the universal orchestration framework for seamless integration and assessment of wide range of no-gate technologies",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p17-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 18,
"content": "How and by what means? (8) WP4 • prepare a detailed plan for the field deployment of selected no-gate crossing point solutions; • successfully deploy selected no-gate crossing point solutions for acceptance assessment; • define and implement clear protocols and procedures for collection and management of research data • conduct thorough assessment of selected no-gate crossing point solutions with focus on privacy, regulatory and data protection aspects • conduct assessments of the social and ethical acceptance of selected solutions by public",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p18-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 19,
"content": "How and by what means? (9) WP5 • create an External Advisory Board consisting of leading experts and key stakeholders in the field of border security; • create a Security Advisory Board consisting of leading experts of the end-user organisations in the field of border security; • create a large network of stakeholders and decision-makers for direct communication on PERSONA requirements, outcomes and best practises; • develop a detailed contingency plan and treatment measures which will form an important part of the guidelines and recommendations to decision makers; • produce and publish the PERSONA textbook, a complete guide and report from the entire acceptance assessment work; • communicate derived guidelines and best practises with stakeholders and decision makers from PERSONA network and beyond",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p19-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 20,
"content": "How and by what means? (10) WP6 • raise public awareness about the project, identifying and developing different strategies to maximise the project visibility among stakeholders; • undertake actions for broad dissemination of the project results to the relevant stakeholders • establish close links with relevant project, especially BES-15 projects and setup synergies for cooperation in technology assessment; • organise three dedicated workshops in order to connect with key stakeholders, exchange assessment results and discuss strategies; • perform a detailed analysis of PERSONA assets, research trends and drivers in order to support the project exploitation; • undertake standardisation activities among international and EU governing bodies with the support of LEAs.",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p20-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 21,
"content": "How and by what means? (11) • Desktop-research • Pilots • Collaboration (projects, end-users, policy-makers, internal stakeholders, external stakeholders) • Semi-structured interviews • Meetings • Workshops • Participation on each others’ events • Aim is the create a best practice that will be actually used",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p21-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 22,
"content": "How and by what means? (12) Dissemination • Building a community • Related European border and custom authorities • Security industry • Scientific community • End users (airports, border crossing points etc. • 32 deliverables • website/brochure/newsletter/social media • Academic and research publication • EC dissemination mechanisms • Demonstrations • Workshops",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p22-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 23,
"content": "When? • 30 months • 1 September 2018 – 28 February 2021 • Continuous collaboration • Workshops in M10, M20 and M30",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p23-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/155584/?format=api",
"number": 24,
"content": "Dziękuję Ci! www.vub.ac.be/LSTS www.qmul.ac.uk www.dpialab.org www.mmv.eecs.qmul.ac.uk",
"width": 3301,
"height": 2550,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/e4/24/51/e42451e8c8ed42e0b89042b4fea442ac/page-p24-{size}.png"
}
]
}
