HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"resource_uri": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"id": 156095,
"site_url": "https://fragdenstaat.de/dokumente/156095-18-eu-course-ciram-risk-analysts-v3_pad-version/",
"title": "18. EU Course CIRAM Risk Analysts V3_PAD version",
"slug": "18-eu-course-ciram-risk-analysts-v3_pad-version",
"description": "",
"published_at": null,
"num_pages": 72,
"public": true,
"listed": true,
"allow_annotation": false,
"pending": false,
"file_url": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/18-eu-course-ciram-risk-analysts-v3_pad-version.pdf",
"file_size": 2122315,
"cover_image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p1-small.png",
"page_template": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p{page}-{size}.png",
"outline": "",
"properties": {
"title": null,
"author": null,
"_tables": [],
"creator": "Adobe InDesign CC 13.1 (Windows)",
"subject": null,
"producer": "Adobe Acrobat Pro 2020 20 Paper Capture Plug-in",
"_format_webp": true
},
"uid": "d406abab-fc93-49fb-9053-d990dcb852e2",
"data": {},
"pages_uri": "/api/v1/page/?document=156095",
"original": null,
"foirequest": null,
"publicbody": null,
"last_modified_at": "2022-05-09 16:28:52.337800+00:00",
"pages": [
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 1,
"content": "LIMITED ::::: FRONTEX Ill EUROPEAN BORDER AND COAST GUARD AGENCY European course for CIRAM risk analysts Developed by the Frontex",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p1-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 2,
"content": "LIMITED This prospectus is for law enforcement use only. Distribution outside the EU Member States and Schengen associated countries’ law enforcement agencies shall be granted by the Frontex. iS: FRONTEX• EUROPEAN BORDER AND COAST GUARD AGENCY Plac Europejski 6 00-844 Warsaw, Poland T +48 22 205 95 00 F +48 22 205 95 01 frontex@frontex.europa.eu www.frontex.europa.eu Frontex identifier: FPI 17.0151 Print version: TT-07-17-176-EN-C ISBN 978-92-9471-091-8 doi:10.2819/148387 ePUB: TT-07-17-176-EN-E ISBN 978-92-9471-089-5 doi:10.2819/533347 PDF: TT-07-17-176-EN-N ISBN 978-92-9471-090-1 doi:10.2819/579989",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p2-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 3,
"content": "LIMITED Development team Ago Tikk (Estonia), Jussi Wacklin (Finland), Juergen Serve (Germany), The non-disclosed part contains personal data, in particular the names of Evangelia Galanopoulou (Greece), Giedrius Strikulis (Lithuania), individuals. The disclosure would undermine the protection of privacy and Dirk van den Broek (the Netherlands), Willem Buijk (the Netherlands), Michal Nowak (Poland), Artur Querido (Portugal), Simon Kelenc (Slovenia), the integrity of the individual, in particular in accordance with European Szabolcs Csonka (Frontex Risk Analysis Unit), Union legislation regarding the protection of personal data and therefore has Radu-Constantin Anton (Frontex Training Unit). to be precluded pursuant to Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. 3",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p3-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 4,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts Common statement We, the members of the working group involved in the development of this framework, hereby declare that the following training standards are based on the Common Integrated Risk Analysis Model and the elaborated Guidelines for Risk Analysis Units published by Frontex, aiming harmonisation of training at European level for CIRAM risk analysts and – by that – enhanced interopera- bility of the staff working in border-related risk analysis offices. Warsaw, Frontex HQ, November 2017 4",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p4-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 5,
"content": "LIMITED Table of Contents \u0007Why an EU course for CIRAM risk analysis? #6 EU certification #6 1. C \u0007 ourse framework #11 1.1.\t\u0007Background #11 1.2. Course description #12 1.3. Course venues #15 1.4. Training team #16 1.5. Certification framework #17 1.6. Administrative issues #20 2. Common Core Curriculum #25 2.1. Risk analysis within integrated border management #25 2.2. Intelligence cycle #26 2.3. Analytical toolbox #30 2.4. CIRAM-based risk analysis #30 2.5. Analytical products #31 3. C\u0007 ourse design #35 3.1. Constraints #35 3.2. Job profile #36 3.3. Programme learning outcomes #37 3.4. Programme learning strategy #38 3.5. Assessment strategy #40 3.6. Tests and weighting #41 3.7. Module I design: entry module #46 3.8. Module II design: Basics of risk analysis #47 3.9. Module III design: Models of risk analysis #49 3.10. Module IV design: applied risk analysis #50 3.11. Others #51 4. Content of modules #55 Module I: Entry module (revision) #55 Module II: Basics of risk analysis #56 Module III: Models of risk analysis #59 Module IV: Applied risk analysis #62 Assessment and certification session #65 Course summary #68 5. Sample of study case #71 5",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p5-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 6,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts \u0007Why an EU course for CIRAM risk analysis? The idea of a European Course for CIRAM risk analysis appeared in the sec- ond part of 2016 following requests of several EU MS addressed to the Frontex Training Unit and the Frontex Risk Analysis Unit to take the initiative in organ- ising joint training sessions for risk analysts, CIRAM based. Frontex Training Unit invited EU MSs experts to join a meeting in Warsaw, May 2016. During the meeting, attending experts embraced the idea of a joint certification system under the umbrella of Frontex, based on Sectorial Quali- fication Framework, aiming to harmonise the profile, competences and even- tually the practices in the field of risk analysis at European level, fostering the implementation and use of CIRAM and promoting a smooth European coop- eration in border management-related risk analysis. This decision paved the way to the first European Course for CIRAM risk analysts. EU certification What is a CIRAM risk analyst? Without a common answer to such question, any discussion about EU certification of CIRAM risk analysts has no substance. During the initial discussions with EU MSs experts, in May 2016, the word ‘op- erator’ – proposed to be used, raised concerns due to the fact, in common lan- guage, ‘operator’ is connected to the picture of persons operating a machine/ equipment. However, in the context of CIRAM, the risk analyst is not a person who operates a certain machine but a fully specialised member of staff with a high degree of independence and analytical thinking, performing professional tasks based on the Common Integrated Risk Analysis Model within the scope of Integrated Border Management. 6",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p6-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 7,
"content": "LIMITED Joint development A European course can only be the outcome of a common development at European level, involving EU Member States experts, discussing, drafting and agreeing on every sentence and sequence of the course framework and con- tent. In this specific case, as the topic was border management related, the process was coordinated by Frontex. A valid joint development process even- tually requires the common agreement of a significant pool of experts from a representative number of Member States including on the recognition of the qualification (s) gained after graduating from the course. Joint training Joint training means that learners from EU Member States are joining a cen- tralised training session, having the chance to interact, discuss, debate and clarify the topics until they reach a common understanding. They do not only receive knowledge but they build common knowledge during the course. Even- tually, such group reaches maturity when the capability to smoothly cooperate while performing common procedures is proven. Common training means also that the training team was trained at EU level (in this case under the patron- age of Frontex). In fact, trainers were a priori involved in project development. The training team is representative for the target group (highly specialised in course subjects) and legitimate (large experience in the field and represent- ing EU MSs border management agencies). Joint assessment For a professional competence to be recognised at EU level, beside the need to have the documentation in place in line with existing requirements, it must be assessed and certified by a European team of evaluators. The team must fol- low common assessment rules, practices, templates, to make sure the quality assurance mechanisms are in place and followed. Transparency of the certifi- cation process is part of the quality assurance. Ideally, the members of the as- sessment team must be different to the members of the training team. 7",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p7-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 8,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 8",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p8-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 9,
"content": "LIMITED 1. Course framework # Course framework 1 9",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p9-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 10,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 10",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p10-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 11,
"content": "LIMITED 1. Course framework 1. \u0007Course framework 1.1.\t\u0007Background Following the adoption of the Common Integrated Risk Analysis Model and the development of the Guidelines for Risk Analysis Units, in order to ensure harmonisation of standards in EU Member States and Schengen Associated States with respect to border management-related risk analysis, having as ul- timate goal to guarantee the availability of relevant expertise in risk analysis offices, a training and certification system for European CIRAM risk analysts was designed using the competence of EU MS specialists. Under the joint certification system, officers nominated by Member States and Schengen Associated Countries are jointly trained based on an EU curriculum, using EU training tools and course programme, while the course delivery is per- formed by EU trainers assigned by Frontex. At the end of the training, learn- ers are certified by an assessment team acting under the mandate of Frontex, based on the already designed certification system. The EU dimension of the course is ensured by the joint development of the course materials, course pro- gramme, course schedule and course assessment system under the umbrella of Frontex. The EU course for CIRAM risk analysts was built and it is being de- livered by actual risk analysts and FRAN members for future border manage- ment risk analysts and – why not – for future FRAN members. Border management organisations from EU Member States and Schengen As- sociated Countries (SAC) willing to be embrace the spirit of this programme, are kindly invited to assess and internally recognise this certification (CIRAM risk analyst) based on the already designed common standards, as a step forward in enhancing the scale of existing professional network that will enable – following such course – mutual recognition of qualifications and con- sequently Erasmus-like programmes for CIRAM risk analysts under the pa- tronage of Frontex. 1.1.1. Common definition for ‘CIRAM risk analyst’ CIRAM risk analysts are the staff operating in EU Member States or Schengen Associated Countries border management authorities, carrying out CIRAM- based risk analysis as support for decision-making. 11",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p11-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 12,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 1.1.2. Credit points The course for CIRAM risk analysts was built in line with the European Training Qualification framework and subsequently in line with the Sectorial Qualifi- cation Framework endorsed by the Frontex Management Board in November 2012. Equivalent number of credit points: 9 (213 training hours). It follows pro- visions of the Copenhagen Declaration and Bologna Process principles. In order to have the qualification recognised in home states, documentation (English version) may be handed out to the certified CIRAM risk analysts at the end of the course. The present publication may also serve as a basis to initiate the national recognition of qualifications for CIRAM risk analysts. 1.2. Course description The basis of the course is the ‘Common core curriculum for CIRAM risk ana- lysts’ (part of the present publication) developed by Frontex Training Unit in cooperation with EU Member States and Schengen Associated Countries. The course includes one online entry module, three contact/centralised modules, 5 days of assessment and 60 hours of experiential learning in home states (di- vided between modules). The task of carrying out the experiential learning stages in home states (in border management risk analysis offices) falls un- der the responsibility of the learner and needs to be confirmed in writing by the border management Risk Analysis Unit of the respective Member State. 1.2.1. Knowledge, skills and competences In order to act as CIRAM risk analyst, the learner will be trained to: justify the role and the need for a Common Integrated Risk Analysis Model; describe risk analysis process and products used for comprehensive bor- der management; perform risk analysis tasks; prepare risk analysis products in line with CIRAM; brief specific audiences in border management risk analysis-related topics; take responsibility for the quality of analytical products delivered and for the information exchanged with other units/agencies; ensure the reliability, integrity and validity of information collected for risk analysis and the protection of fundamental rights when performing risk analysis tasks (e.g. personal data); 12",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p12-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 13,
"content": "LIMITED 1. Course framework promote cooperation and cooperate with other units within the scope of CIRAM implementation 1.2.2. Entry requirements Fair command of English language (B1 minimum); Available for the entire duration of the course; Working as/planned to work as CIRAM risk analyst as soon as the course is completed; Agreement of the sending authority to ensure future employment as risk analyst; Acceptance of the sending authority of the course qualification(s) and cer- tification process. 1.2.3. Modules Course is divided into four modules, as follows: Module I (entry module) is delivered online, as self-study. Content of the mod- ule is made available, via Frontex Virtual Aula, to all potential candidates. Fu- ture or actual staff working in border management risk analysis offices may enrol online to the entry module following communication with national au- thorities, as soon as the course is officially declared open. There is no fixed limit in relation to the number of candidates enrolled by each Member States to the entry module. Enrolment requires prior registration to Frontex Virtual Aula. Access to the platform may be granted by the Virtual Aula national administrator or by the Frontex Administrator. It has to be mentioned during a candidate’s registration that the purpose is the EU course for CIRAM risk analysts. Such information will enable the administrator to provide candidates with access to the system and – at a later stage – to the entry module. Access to the entry module is granted to all candidates at the same date. Spe- cific materials are available for self-study. However, all materials available under the course platform – at the moment of receiving access to the entry mod- ule – shall be treated as supporting materials for the entry exam. The regis- tration period has a duration of 5 weeks. The allocated time granted to study the materials for entry exam is 6 weeks. 13",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p13-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 14,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts The entry exam is carried out online, at the same time for all registered learn- ers. A simulation exam is conducted usually 3 weeks in advance in order to check if technical specifications required by the platform are met by all stations to be used during the official entry exam. The exam date is communicated in advance to all learners while the exact hour is decided following a question- naire addressed to all enrolled candidates. The exam has 40 questions (mul- tiple choice) and 50 minutes allocated. The result is revealed to the candidate immediately after the test, based on the number of points achieved, as ‘short- listed’ or ‘not shortlisted’. A minimum of 50 % from the total number of points must be achieved in order to be shortlisted. Admission to the course is granted to the candidates that have passed the test, within the limit of available seats (one – exceptionally two candidates per state) based on the result obtained (e.g. if only 15 seats are available, the first 15 candidates in the order of merit will be accepted provided that they are from different states and all of them reached the minimum number of points fore- seen). In case no candidates from a certain state reaches the minimum num- ber of points foreseen, the seat is released and may be occupied by a second candidate from another state (order of merit). In case the balance per partici- pating state is considerably affected following the entry test results, the course management team reserves the right to change the required number of points for admission to 40 %. In case two candidates from the same state have the same score, the seconding state will be asked to decide on the final candidate, unless extra seats can be arranged by Frontex Training Unit. Candidates are notified if they are shortlisted as soon as the entry test is submitted; Detailed test results are available individually and can be seen only by the candidate; General test results (ranking) will be available under the course platform in the same day; The final list (course learners) will be published under the course platform latest next day; The official invitation to the first course session is sent within a maximum of 5 days; Non-qualified candidates will lose access to the course platform. Module II (basics of risk analysis) includes 5 days of seminars in connection with the entry exam topics and specialised sessions focusing on intelligence cycle, analytical tools and techniques, types and sources of information. An 14",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p14-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 15,
"content": "LIMITED 1. Course framework experiential learning stage at home with a minimum duration of 20 hours be- fore joining module III is required. Module III (models of risk analysis) includes 5 days of lectures and seminars related to the Common Integrated Risk Analysis model, including exercises related to the identification and use of CIRAM elements in practice. An expe- riential learning stage at home with a minimum duration of 20 hours before joining module IV is required. Module IV (applied risk analysis) includes 5 days of lectures and practice re- lated to the development and use of various analytical products, CIRAM based. Simulations of certification exams are included. An experiential learning stage at home with a minimum duration of 20 hours before joining the assessment session is required. 1.2.4. Certification session This includes the knowledge test (online), the practical test (product devel- opment) and the analytical test (critical analysis of a risk analysis product). 1.2.5. Reassessment session As a resit procedure (in case of failure) the learner will be re-examined at the end of the next course which generally means 6 to 12 months later. Exception- ally, if the assessment team consider as feasible and the learner agrees, reas- sessment can be done at the end of the same assessment session. In such case, the learner will lose the right to join the initially planned (official) re-examina- tion session (6 to 12 months later). 1.3. Course venues 1.3.1. Declaration of the interest to host The locations where the modules will be carried out are selected based on the declaration of interest of training centres from EU MS and SAC. A decla- ration of interest to host must be communicated to Frontex Training Unit at the latest in September of the current year (for sessions to be carried out dur- ing the following year). 15",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p15-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 16,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 1.3.2. Requirements for hosting locations In order to host a course module, the respective location needs to offer the following basic conditions: A training facility with campus-based accommodation (minimum 20 rooms with individual shower and bathroom); A hotel in the proximity of the training location (minimum 8 rooms available); An airport nearby, requiring maximum 60 minutes transportation time to/ from course location to the airport; A functional free Wi-Fi available both in the training centre and at the lo- cation of accommodation; A training room for minimum 25 persons with functional training equip- ment (flipchart, video beamer, printer) and internet access. 1.4. Training team 1.4.1. Considerations on the assignment of the CIRAM main trainers Only experienced border management staff certified by Frontex Training Unit as ‘CIRAM risk analyst’ (with a minimum overall grade ‘good’) may be assigned as ‘CIRAM main trainer’. Main trainers are bound to attend all sessions of the course, delivering training and providing feedback to learners. Specialised topics are to be covered by the Agency’s internal staff (e.g. Risk Analysis Unit, Fron- tex Situation Centre). Assigned CIRAM main trainers are obliged to attend a Frontex train the trainer’s certification course within a maximum of 1 year fol- lowing the date of their nomination. ‘CIRAM main trainers’: must have a good command of the English language (B2); must have been involved in the development of training for CIRAM risk analysts; must have a minimum 7 years of experience in border management risk analysis; must presently work in a border management risk analysis office in an EU MS or SAC; must have graduated previously from a European Course for CIRAM risk analysts organised by Frontex; should have experience in delivering training for border guards/police if possible (desirable); 16",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p16-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 17,
"content": "LIMITED 1. Course framework 1.4.2. Considerations on the assignment of the CIRAM course assessors ‘CIRAM’ course assessors are appointed from among existing ‘Eurosur main trainers’. Exceptionally, the main trainers used in one course may also act as assessors for the same course. However, for quality assurance purposes, it is preferable that the course and the learners are evaluated by staff who were not involved in training delivery. ‘CIRAM course assessors’: must prove a good command of the English language (B2); must have been involved in the elaboration of CIRAM-related documents at EU level; must have been continuously involved in the development of training for CIRAM risk analysts; must have minimum 10 years of experience in border management risk analysis; must presently work in a border management risk analysis office in an EU MS or SAC; must have acted as CIRAM main trainer in at least one European Course for CIRAM risk analysts; should be a member of FRAN if possible (desirable) 1.5. Certification framework The certification session includes three tests: the knowledge test (to assess whether the theoretical concepts are mastered), a practical test (to ensure the learner is able to use their own analytical capability and own creativity in or- der to deliver CIRAM-based analytical products) and an analytical test (to as- sess whether the learner is able to evaluate and report on the quality of a risk analysis product). Tests are simultaneously evaluated by four course assessors. 1.5.1. Knowledge test This is based on points. There are 40 questions (multiple choice), each ques- tion having 0.5 points allocated for the correct answer (20 points maximum). A minimum of 10.00 points is required to pass the test. Allocated time is 50 min- utes. The test is performed online under the direct supervision of the train- ing team. The learner receives the feedback as soon as the test results are submitted. The test cannot be repeated within the same assessment session. 17",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p17-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 18,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 1.5.2. Practical test This is based on points. It consists in the development of a risk analysis prod- uct (including methodology), based on a set of documents provided by the as- sessment team. Allotted time for the test is 180 minutes. The test is performed (in writing) under the direct supervision of the assessment team. The maxi- mum number of points is 20.00). A minimum of 10.00 points are required to pass the test. Points are granted individually by each assessor for each evaluation item, and they are cross-checked afterwards. Each sub-item may be marked from 0 to 1 points in five steps (0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00) based on a common evalu- ation file. The acceptable difference between the points granted by assessors for the same evaluation sub-item is 0.25 points. The acceptable difference be- tween the points granted by assessors for the same evaluation item is 0.50 points. The acceptable difference between the total points granted by asses- sors for the test is 1.0 point. In the case where the difference between assessors is bigger than the accepta- ble difference, negotiations are carried out until the difference is clarified. If no agreement is reached, the sub-items of assessors are both reduced automat- ically to their average until balance is established. The learner receives feed- back/results from the assessment team at the end of the certification session. 1.5.3. Analytical test This is based on points. It consists in the critical analysis of a risk analysis prod- uct (oral). Allotted time for the test: 35 minutes (10 minutes are allotted to study the case and 25 minutes for presentation and interview). The test is performed under the direct supervision of the assessment team. The maximum number of points is 20.00. A minimum of 10.00 points are required to pass the test. Points are granted individually by each assessor for each evaluation item, and they are cross-checked afterwards. Each sub-item may be marked from 0 to 1 point in five steps (0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00) based on a common evaluation file. The exception is the ‘CIRAM-based analysis’ sub-items marked from 0 to 2 points in five steps (0.00, 0.50, 1.00, 1.50, 2.00). The acceptable difference between the points granted by assessors for the same evaluation sub-item is 0.25 points (0.50 points in the case of ‘CIRAM based analysis’ sub-items). The acceptable difference between the points granted by assessors for the same 18",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p18-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 19,
"content": "LIMITED 1. Course framework evaluation item is 0.50 points. The acceptable difference between the total points granted by assessors for the test is 1.0 point. In the case where the difference between assessors is bigger than the accepta- ble difference, negotiations are carried out until the difference is clarified. If no agreement is reached, the sub-items of assessors are both reduced automat- ically to their average until balance is established. The learner receives feed- back/results from the assessment team at the end of the certification session. 1.5.4. Final grade In order to be certified as a CIRAM risk analyst the learner must pass all tests foreseen. In case of failure, the certification session is resumed with the pos- sibility for resit during the next certification session. Such procedure does not involve repeating the course. The learner will be re-examined only in connec- tion with the failed test(s). The final grade is calculated as follows: 54.00 points or more and no failed tests: ‘outstanding’ 43.00 to 53.99 points and no failed tests: ‘good’ 36.00 to 42.99 points and no failed tests: ‘satisfactory’ 35.99 points or less (or/and failed tests): ‘not compliant’ (failed) The final grade shall be mentioned in the graduation paper. 1.5.5. Course theses Learners are invited to elaborate a thesis (team-based or individually) of 20– 25 pages, on a specific subject (risk analysis related). The subjects are estab- lished at the end of Module II. Following the analysis by the course management team, the Frontex Training Unit may publish the most relevant theses with the support of EC (OPOCE). For every thesis marked by the course manage- ment team as ‘considered to be published’, (up to) 1.00 save point is granted to contributor(s). The point can be used during the official assessment session in any of the planned tests, as needed by the learner. 1.5.6. Save points policy At the start of each centralised module, an interim evaluation is performed (online test). The results of the interim assessments, together with the results of the entry test, are converted up to a maximum of 1 point that can be used during the official assessment session, in any of the planned tests, as needed 19",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p19-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 20,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts by the learner (sample calculation: 35 % obtained on the first test + 55 % ob- tained on the second test + 90 % obtained on the third test. Overall average: 60 %. Converted to save points: 0.60 points to be used by the learner in the official assessment session. If we include also the 1.00 save points related to the thesis, a maximum of 2 save points can be earned during the course, and these can be used by the learner during the official assessment session. 1.5.7. Selection for the pool of CIRAM main trainers Based on the results obtained (minimum ‘good’), the CIRAM course assessors may select certified CIRAM risk analysts to be taken on board as CIRAM main trainers during any of the future courses. Selected candidates will be asked to complete the train the trainer’s course delivered by Frontex Training Unit. 1.6. Administrative issues 1.6.1. Responsibility of trainees Learners are expected to fully respect all tasks given and to act according to usual disciplinary rules in the hosting state and according to the Frontex Code of conduct. Participation in the course will be ended in case of intoler- able behaviour. 1.6.2. Costs of participation All costs for training (including training materials) and participation in the course (including accommodation, catering and transportation costs) are fully covered by Frontex. Daily allowances to the participants will be reimbursed by Frontex according to the existing reimbursement rules established for every session. 1.6.3. Accommodation As a rule, learners will be accommodated on campus (single or double room equipped with individual bathroom) or hotels (depending on local possibilities) for the entire duration of the course. 20",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p20-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 21,
"content": "LIMITED 1. Course framework 1.6.4. Holiday and overtime Learners shall not be absent for annual leave during the course. Repeated ab- sence will lead to exclusion from the course. No overtime during the course is collected. Occasionally, Saturday may be used as a training day. The training day starts at 09:00 and ends at 17:30. 1.6.5. Insurance No special insurance is provided by Frontex for learners; neither health, nor accident, etc. as this is a national responsibility. 1.6.6. National salary Frontex does not cover any national salary of participants during their partic- ipation in the course. 1.6.7. Dress code Frontex learner vests marked as ‘CIRAM student’ may be provided and they may be used for the entire duration of the course. They shall be exchanged at the end of the course, depending on the final result obtained, with stand- ard ‘CIRAM risk analyst’ vest. No other (special) uniform is required. No over- weight costs are reimbursed for flights. During official common dinners offered by the host (usually Friday evening after the course week is closed) smart cas- ual dress code is required (no tie). 1.6.8. Other requirements Learners are kindly asked to bring a laptop (Wi-Fi module ready), memory stick/external hard disk. At the end of each module, individual consultations are carried out by main trainers with every learner. As each module ends on Fri- day at 17:30 and in all situations an official dinner is offered by the host during the same day, departure from the course is established for Saturday morning. 21",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p21-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 22,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 22",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p22-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 23,
"content": "1. Course framework Common Core Curriculum 2 23",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p23-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 24,
"content": "Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 24",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p24-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 25,
"content": "LIMITED 2. Common Core Curriculum 2. Common Core Curriculum 2.1. Risk analysis within integrated border management Category learning outcomes: To explain the meaning of risk analysis generally and the meaning of inte- grated border management risk analysis particularly, including the role of CIRAM; To connect the concept of integrated border management risk analysis to various legal provisions in force at EU level; To justify the need for using risk analysis in border management and the importance of a common risk analysis model at EU level. 2.1.1. Introduction to risk analysis Chapter learning outcomes To define the risk analysis concept in general and in border management particularly; To list types of risk analysis in general and types of law enforcement-related risk analysis while highlighting the differences between them; To explain risk analysis’ crucial role in border and security situation awareness; To explain the added value of having harmonised procedures in risk anal- ysis at EU level; To distinguish Frontex risk analysis procedures, their outcomes/similarities/ differences with other organisations with law enforcement tasks. 2.1.2. Schengen Border Code Chapter learning outcomes To describe the connection between the Schengen Borders Code and risk analysis including the evolution through its amendments and supportive documents; To list the CIRAM references under the Schengen Borders Code; To justify the need for conducting regular and EU-compliant risk analysis for effective and cost‑efficient border management. 2.1.3. EBCG regulation Chapter learning outcomes To list the main events of the historical process that led to the establish- ment of the Agency; To list the main events of the historical process that led to the establish- ment of the CIRAM; 25",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p25-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 26,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts To highlight the importance of CIRAM and its application in the Frontex environment; To describe the meaning of ‘vulnerability assessment’ and the role of the Agency in this respect. 2.1.4. Eurosur regulation Chapter learning outcomes To explain the scope and highlight the importance of the Eurosur regula- tion and its binding application at EU level, in relation to border surveillance including the benefits of a common border surveillance system at EU level; To describe how risk analysis is applied; To justify the risk analysis role in the Eurosur framework; To explain the relevance of the information management process for an NCC operator; To describe the principles, elements and concepts of information manage- ment process; To describe analytical product and services, types of reports including their purpose and types of information and intelligence used in the context of Eurosur. 2.2. Intelligence cycle Category learning outcomes: To explain the essential role of the intelligence cycle in the field of risk analysis; To justify the broad use of the intelligence cycle by law enforcement community; To describe the use of the intelligence cycle and concisely the procedure that it introduces. 2.2.1. Introduction to intelligence cycle Chapter learning outcomes To describe the concept, the role and elements of the intelligence cycle; To explain the meaning of information and intelligence including their features; To describe the differences between information process and intelligence cycle; 26",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p26-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 27,
"content": "LIMITED 2. Common Core Curriculum To define and list sources of information and sources of intelligence; To describe the most common types of information (by structure/validation/ classification); To describe the most common types of sources (open/official sources). 2.2.2. Tasking Chapter learning outcomes To describe the meaning of tasking and its role in the intelligence cycle; To divide tasks into small components based on defined rules; To formulate a hypothetical running log of tasks, identify challenges and set priorities; To define terms of reference and the relevance of terms of reference for risk analysis; To describe the procedures required, the elements and the structure of terms of reference. 2.2.3. Collection Chapter learning outcomes To recognise the fundamental role of information collection; To explain the principles of data collection; To identify the data eligible and the sources that could be exploited within the scope of risk analysis; To examine the legitimacy and consistency of sources that could be ex- ploited within the scope of risk analysis; To demonstrate the techniques for generating hypothesis; To schedule the procedure, sources and time needed for the collection; To identify the need and develop indicators; To identify the need for security clearances; To develop a collection plan based on existing techniques/rules; To perform a downward progression of the analytical task through indicators. 2.2.4. Evaluation Chapter learning outcomes To define the scope of evaluation within the intelligence cycle and within the analytical process; To integrate the evaluation principles in the analytical procedures; To distinguish between different types of evaluation; 27",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p27-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 28,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts To conduct the evaluation procedures accordingly (e.g. of sources, information); To perform evaluation of sources and information within the scope of risk analysis; To perform assessment of terms of reference; To evaluate outcome’s impact to client’s needs; To assess the added value of the risk analysis outcome in terms of novelty or insight provided. 2.2.5. Collation Chapter learning outcomes To explain the meaning of ‘collation’ and its relevance for the intelligence cycle and the analytical process; To justify the need for a formal and unified system of collecting information; To compare available collation solutions; To identify different types of data recording and retrieval systems; To manage information/intelligence varying in terms of quality and quan- tity by the use of collation; To implement flexibility of the collation system in order to suit to the vari- ety of the quality of data. 2.2.6. Analysis and interpretation Chapter learning outcomes To define the meaning of analysis of the available information; To define the meaning of interpretation of the available information; To recognise the different approach among analysis and interpretation; To demonstrate the pros and cons of each procedure; To choose the appropriate process for each stage of analytical project; To relate analysis and interpretation for a more exploratory result; To apply them; To distinguish the connection between concepts, values and facts; To provide prediction according to solid reasoning; To build better arguments and soundly based conclusions; To develop probability statements; To identify the interpretation methods; To locate the need of logical thinking; To assess the punctual approach in interpretation practise. 28",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p28-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 29,
"content": "LIMITED 2. Common Core Curriculum 2.2.7. Reporting Chapter learning outcomes To outline the importance of the reporting stage in the intelligence cycle; To recognise the special features that reporting subject and procedure requires; To list the types of reporting according to various classifications; To categorise the methods of reporting according to presenting methods; To describe the structure of reporting and its variations; To report according to analytical requirements. 2.2.8. Dissemination Chapter learning outcomes To explain the concept of ‘dissemination’ and it’s role for risk analysis; To describe the dissemination options; To classify products according to all related factors (e.g. recipients, sources, goal); To justify the importance of handling codes; To identify the relation between codes and sources used for the produc- tion of risk analysis reports; To list and assess the channels used according to the classification and han- dling code of the risk analysis product. 2.2.9. Review Chapter learning outcomes To explain the concept of ‘review’ and its role for risk analysis; To explain the review procedure within risk analysis process; To list the subjects of review; To choose and make use of the methods of reviewing (oral, written). 2.2.10. Implementation Chapter learning outcomes To justify the relevance of implementation for the risk analysis process; To describe the intelligence cycle procedure in terms of implementation. 29",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p29-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 30,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 2.3. Analytical toolbox Category learning outcomes To make the distinction between tools and techniques; To make use of analytical tools, techniques and services when developing analytical products. 2.3.1. Supporting tools Chapter learning outcomes To describe the role of catalogue of available tools for analytical process; To select the right tools to be attributed to analytical procedures; To justify the need for tools during the CIRAM process; To explain the purpose of the surveillance tools provided by the Agency; To describe the purpose of various services; To make a request of a service using existing tools. 2.3.2. Supporting techniques Chapter learning outcomes To describe the techniques that could be used during the analytical procedures; To make efficient use of supporting techniques in risk analysis process (e.g. creative thinking, predictive analysis, field based techniques). 2.4. CIRAM-based risk analysis Category learning outcomes To perform CIRAM-based risk analysis. 2.4.1. CIRAM risk analysis concepts Chapter learning outcomes To describe the main risk analysis concepts in line with CIRAM; To identify threats, vulnerabilities, impact and risks; To describe threats, vulnerabilities, impact and risks; To measure threats, vulnerabilities, impact and rate risks; To recommend measures based on the identified risks. 30",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p30-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 31,
"content": "LIMITED 2. Common Core Curriculum 2.4.2. Threat assessment Chapter learning outcomes To explain the concept of ‘threat’ and describe the mechanism for assessment; To measure and describe a threat based on existing rules; To use a systematic approach when assessing a threat. 2.4.3. Vulnerability assessment Chapter learning outcomes To explain the concept of ‘vulnerability’; To demonstrate the mechanisms for assessment; To measure and describe a vulnerability based on existing rules; To use a systematic approach when assessing a vulnerability. 2.4.4. Impact assessment Chapter learning outcomes To explain the concept of ‘impact’; To describe the mechanism for assessment; To measure and describe an impact based on existing rules; To use a systematic approach when assessing the impact. 2.4.5. Risk assessment Chapter learning outcomes To explain the concept of ‘risk’; To describe the mechanism for risk assessment; To rate/level and describe risks based on existing rules; To use a systematic approach when assessing risks; To develop pertinent recommendations for countering risks. 2.5. Analytical products Category learning outcomes To create and deliver analytical products. 31",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p31-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 32,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 2.5.1. Introduction to analytical products Chapter learning outcomes To describe the concept and the scope of analytical products; To classify analytical products; To distinguish between different analytical products; To describe the design principles and protocols when drafting analytical products; To describe writing styles/techniques To choose a style based on the context of usage. 2.5.2. Main analytical products Chapter learning outcomes To list the main analytical products, their roles and opportunity context; To develop periodical risk analysis reports; To develop tailored risk analysis reports; To develop briefing analytical notes; To develop risk profiles; To write alerts. 2.5.3. Eurosur analytical products Chapter learning outcomes To list the analytical products available under Eurosur analysis layer and the role of analysis layer; To describe the purpose and structure of the briefing note and the analyt- ical monitor report; To describe the scope of key developments; To justify the importance of best practices in the scope of analytical prod- ucts development; To describe the purpose and the relevance of earth observation report and supporting analytical report. 32",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p32-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 33,
"content": "2. Common Core Curriculum Course Design 3 33",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p33-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 34,
"content": "Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 34",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p34-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 35,
"content": "LIMITED 3. Course design 3. C \u0007 ourse design 3.1. Constraints 3.1.1. Time related The non-disclosed part contains Maximum 20 days detailed to be used information for centralisedregarding training theand modus operandi assessment due of law enforcement officials to possible performingnationaltraining restrictions applied to activities. own staff attending Disclosing such informationEuropean/ would expose the working international methods courses; applied in ongoing and future operations, thus obstructing Saturday will be used as departure day in order to make full use of Friday their effectiveness in prevention of cross-border crime and unauthorized border crossings. In as a training day; consequence, it would undermine the protection of the public interest as regards public Maximum one course at EU level to be carried out in one financial year due security and thus, to cannot be disclosed pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) limited availability of trainers, bound by various commitments to their first indent of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.national authorities. 3.1.2. Participants related Ideally 20 but maximum 25 learners per session due to quality assurance reasons. 3.1.3. Entry requirements related Fair command of English language (B1 minimum); The non-disclosed part contains detailed information regarding the modus operandi of law Available for the entire duration of the course; enforcement officials performing training activities. Disclosing such information would Working as/planned to work as CIRAM risk analyst as soon as the course expose the working methods applied in ongoing and future operations, thus obstructing is completed; their effectiveness in prevention of cross-border crime and Agreement of the sending authority to ensure future employment as risk unauthorized border crossings. In consequence, itanalyst; would undermine the protection of the public interest as regards public security and thus, cannot beofdisclosed Acceptance the sending pursuant authority toofArticle the course4(1)(a) first indentand qualification(s) of Regulation cer- (EC) No 1049/2001. tification process. 3.1.4. Human resources related Reduced availability of CIRAM main trainers (5 officers); The non-disclosed part contains detailed information regarding the modus operandi of law enforcement officials performing training activities. Disclosing Reduced such information would expose availability the working methods ofongoing applied in CIRAM course and future assessors operations, (5 officers); thus obstructing their effectiveness in prevention of cross- Reduced border crime and unauthorized availability border crossings. of Frontex In consequence, RAU experts; it would undermine the protection of the public interest as regards public security and thus, cannot be disclosed pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) first indent of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. 3.1.5. Course venues related The non-disclosed part contains detailed information regarding the Training facility, preferably with campus-based accommodation facility (min- imum 25 rooms with individual shower and bathroom) or hotel in the prox- modus operandi of law enforcement officials imity of the training centre with a capacity of minimum 25 rooms; performing training activities. Disclosing Airport nearby, such information requiring maximum 60 minutes wouldtransportation expose the working time to/from methods applied course in location ongoing and to the future operations, thus obstructing their airport; Functional free Wi-Fi available both in the training centre and at the loca- effectiveness tion in of prevention accommodation; of cross-border crime and unauthorized border crossings. In consequence, it would undermine the protection of the public interest as regards public security and thus, cannot be disclosed pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) first indent of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. 35",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p35-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 36,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts The non-disclosed part contains detailed information regarding the modus operandi of law enforcement officials performing training activities. Disclosing such information would expose the working methods applied inongoing androom Training futurefor operations, minimumthus obstructing 25 persons their with effectiveness functional in prevention training equipmentof cross-border crime and unauthorized borderbeamer, (flipchart, video crossings.printer) In consequence, it would and internet undermine the protection of the public access. interest as regards public security and thus, cannot be disclosed pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) first indent of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. 3.2. Job profile 3.2.1. Knowledge Explain the connection between risk analysis and EU integrated border management; Justify the role and the need for a Common Integrated Risk Analysis Model; Describe the intelligence cycle and its relevance for border management risk analysis products; Describe risk analysis process and products used for comprehensive bor- der management; Outline various sources and types of information useful for border man- agement risk analysis; Justify the importance of ‘outside the box’ thinking in border manage- ment risk analysis. 3.2.2. Skills Perform risk analysis tasks in line with CIRAM; Prepare risk analysis products in line with CIRAM; Brief specific audiences in border management risk analysis-related topics; Present orally risk analysis products to an operational audience; Identify case-based cooperation partners at national/EU level. 3.2.3. Competences Promote cooperation and cooperate with other units in scope of CIRAM implementation; Take responsibility for the quality of analytical products delivered; Take responsibility for the information exchanged with other units/agencies; Ensure the reliability, integrity and validity of information collected for risk analysis; Ensure protection of fundamental rights when performing risk analysis tasks (e.g. personal data). 36",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p36-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 37,
"content": "LIMITED 3. Course design 3.3. Programme learning outcomes 3.3.1. Knowledge K Explain the connection between risk analysis and EU Integrated Border 4 Management K Describe the intelligence cycle and its relevance for border management 5 risk analysis products K Describe risk analysis process and products used for comprehensive 5 border management K Outline various sources and types of information useful for border 5 management risk analysis K Justify the importance of ‘outside the box’ thinking in border management 5 risk analysis SQF LO: Describe a defined range of national, EU and international law, policies, rules and 5 procedures relevant to border guarding activities. 3.3.2. Skills S Perform risk analysis tasks in line with CIRAM 5 S Prepare risk analysis products in line with CIRAM 5 S Brief specific audiences in border management risk analysis-related topics 5 S Present orally risk analysis products to an operational audience 5 S Identify case-based cooperation partners at national/EU level 5 SQF LO: Apply specialised knowledge and skills in border guarding areas that require 5 specialised professional competences. 3.3.3. Competences C Promote cooperation and cooperate with other units in scope of CIRAM 5 implementation C Take responsibility for the quality of analytical products delivered 5 C Take responsibility for the information exchanged with other units/ 5 agencies C Ensure the reliability, integrity and validity of information collected for risk 5 analysis C Ensure protection of fundamental rights when performing risk analysis 5 tasks (e.g. personal data) SQF LO: Ensure that the CIRAM risk analyst integrates and promotes the fundamental 5 rights of all persons in its processes and takes initiatives within the scope of EU CIRAM cooperation. 37",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p37-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 38,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 3.3.4. SQF course level Majority of learning outcomes described as level 5. Overall course level: 5 5 3.4. Programme learning strategy The course includes one online entry module, three contact/centralised mod- ules, 5 days of assessment and 60 hours of experiential learning in home states (divided between modules). The learning strategy is focused on skills devel- opment and facilitating learning ‘by doing’, promoting a learner-centred ap- proach. Group work and peer review are essential elements of the learning strategy, designed to ensure active participation of the learners and a collab- orative approach. The programme includes three learning phases: independ- ent, contact and experiential (not necessary in the same order as the cycle repeats with each module). During the entry module, the learners receive an online training package with documents and lesson content to refresh or familiarise them with the CIRAM legal basis, risk analysis/fundamental rights related topics and CIRAM terminol- ogy. Learners may directly contact the course trainers for clarifications/guidance. During the contact weeks, the learners develop competencies in the applica- tion of CIRAM engaging in practical exercises and group work. On the first day of the each contact week the learners undergo interim evaluations in relation to what was thought during the previous module. After each contact week, the learners and asked to practice at the risk analysis units in home states and also to assess in practice the feasibility of the meth- ods/techniques/procedures learned during the contact weeks. As a horizontal activity, the learners are asked to develop a thesis (risk analy- sis related) along this training process and to present it to the evaluation team during the certification session. Generally, the sequence of the programme can be summarised as follows: ac- quiring the knowledge, have the knowledge processed/validated via practical examples, develop skills to transfer information to accomplished risk analy- sis tasks based on the acquired knowledge, make professional decisions and 38",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p38-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 39,
"content": "LIMITED 3. Course design implement them based on the knowledge acquired and the skills gained dur- ing specific modules. 3.4.1. Module I: Entry module Module I is delivered online, as self-study. There is no limit in relation to the number of candidates proposed by Member States at this stage. Entry exam it is carried out online, at the same time for all registered learners. Module is closed with an entry exam of 40 questions (multiple choices) and 50 minutes allocated. Result is revealed to the candidate immediately after the test, based on the number of points achieved, as ‘shortlisted’ or ‘not shortlisted’. A mini- mum of 50 % from the total number of points must be achieved in order to be shortlisted. In case the seats remain unoccupied following the entry test re- sults, the course management team reserve the right to change the required number of points for admission to 40 %. 30 learning hours are estimated as needed to be invested in order to go through the online materials and favour- ably assume the content. 3.9.2. Module II: Basics of risk analysis Module II includes 5 days of seminars in connection to the entry exam top- ics and specialised sessions focusing on intelligence cycle, analytical tools and techniques, types and sources of information. An experiential learning stage at home with a minimum duration of 20 hours before joining module III is required. 3.4.3. Module III: Models of risk analysis Module III includes 5 days of lectures and seminars related to Common Inte- grated Risk Analysis model, including exercises related to the identification and use of CIRAM elements in practice. Experiential learning stage at home with a minimum duration of 20 hours before joining module III is required. 3.4.4. Module IV: Applied risk analysis Module IV includes 5 days of lectures and practice related to the development and use of various analytical products, CIRAM based. Simulations of certifica- tion exams are included. An experiential learning stage at home with a min- imum duration of 20 hours before joining the assessment session is required. 39",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p39-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 40,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 3.5. Assessment strategy After the entry test, each learner received immediate online feedback not only in relation to the general result but also in relation to the justification for each individual answer. The meaning of the test is to validate the access to the course only to the learners fulfilling the minimum requirements set and to clarify the expectations. Result of the entry test is also taken into account during the certification test (graded). After each interim assessment (first day of each module) the learner receives immediate online feedback not only in relation to the result but also the jus- tification for each individual answer. The meaning of the test is to ensure the previous knowledge was assimilated so the learners have the right basis to step in the next module. At the same time, the result of the interim assessments are also taken into account during the certification test (graded). Therefore it is expected that motivation to learn remains constant for the entire course duration (not only during the certification session). During the certification session, assessment strategy measures – in order – the level of acquired knowledge (knowledge test), the level of practical skills (practical test) and the capacity to analyse information (competence/analyti- cal test). All tests must be passed in order to be certified as a CIRAM risk an- alyst. However, the learner is obliged to seek a ‘higher that satisfactory’ score in at least one of the tests in order to be able to reach the minimum number of points required to be certified. Passing all tests with a minimum number of points cannot fulfil the quality standards set for certification. Four differ- ent evaluators will assess the performance in all these tests and they must reach, basically, the same individual score under every test (+/– 1 point out of a maximum of 20). 3.5.1. Assignment of course trainers Only experienced border management staff certified by Frontex Training Unit as ‘CIRAM risk analyst’ (with a minimum overall grade ‘good’) may be assigned as ‘CIRAM main trainer’. Main trainers are bound to attend all sessions of the course, delivering training and providing feedback to learners. Specialised topics are to be covered by the Agency’s internal staff (e.g. Risk Analysis Unit, Fron- tex Situation Centre). Assigned CIRAM main trainers are obliged to attend a Frontex train the trainer’s certification course within a maximum of 1 year fol- lowing the date of their nomination. ‘CIRAM main trainers’: 40",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p40-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 41,
"content": "LIMITED 3. Course design must have a good command of the English language (B2); must have been involved in the development of training for CIRAM risk analysts; must have a minimum 7 years of experience in border management risk analysis; must presently work in a border management risk analysis office in an EU MS or SAC; must have graduated previously from a European Course for CIRAM risk analysts organised by Frontex; should have experience in delivering training for border guards/police if possible (desirable); 3.5.2. Assignment of course evaluators ‘CIRAM’ course assessors are appointed from among existing ‘Eurosur main trainers’. Exceptionally, the main trainers used in one course may also act as assessors for the same course. However, for quality assurance purposes, it is preferable that the course and the learners are evaluated by staff who were not involved in training delivery. ‘CIRAM course assessors’: must prove a good command of the English language (B2); must have been involved in the elaboration of CIRAM-related documents at EU level; must have been continuously involved in the development of training for CIRAM risk analysts; must have a minimum 10 years of experience in border management risk analysis; must presently work in a border management risk analysis office in an EU MS or SAC; must have acted as CIRAM main trainer in at least one European course for CIRAM risk analysts; should be a member of FRAN if possible (desirable). 3.6. Tests and weighting The certification session includes three tests: the knowledge test (to assess whether the theoretical concepts are mastered), a practical test (to ensure the learner is able to use their own analytical capability and own creativity in order to deliver CIRAM-based analytical products) and an analytical test (to 41",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p41-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 42,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts assess whether the learner is able to evaluate and report on the quality of a risk analysis product). Tests are simultaneously evaluated by five course assessors. 3.6.1. Knowledge test This is based on points. There are 40 questions (multiple choice), each ques- tion having 0.5 points allocated for the correct answer (20 points maximum). A minimum of 10.00 points are required to pass the test. Allocated time is 50 minutes. The test is performed online under the direct supervision of the training team. The learner receives the feedback as soon as the test results are submitted. The test cannot be repeated within the same assessment session. 3.6.2. Practical test This is based on points. It consists in the development of a risk analysis prod- uct (including methodology), based on a set of documents provided by the assessment team. The allotted time for the test is 180 minutes. The test is performed (in writing) under the direct supervision of the assessment team. The maximum number of points is 20.00. A minimum of 10.00 points are re- quired to pass the test. Points are granted individually by each assessor for each evaluation item, and they are cross-checked afterwards. Each sub-item may be marked from 0 to 1 point in five steps (0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00) based on a common evalua- tion file. The acceptable difference between the points granted by assessors for the same evaluation sub-item is 0.25 points. The acceptable difference be- tween the points granted by assessors for the same evaluation item is 0.50 points. The acceptable difference between the total points granted by asses- sors for the test is 1.0 point. In the case where the difference between assessors is bigger than the accepta- ble difference, negotiations are carried out until the difference is clarified. If no agreement is reached, the sub-items of assessors are both reduced automat- ically to their average until balance is established. The learner receives feed- back/results from the assessment team at the end of the certification session. 3.6.3. Analytical test This is based on points. It consists of the critical analysis of a risk analysis prod- uct (oral). Allotted time for the test: 35 minutes (10 minutes are allotted to study 42",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p42-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 43,
"content": "LIMITED 3. Course design the case and 25 minutes for presentation and interview). The test is performed under the direct supervision of the assessment team. The maximum number of points is 20.00. A minimum of 10.00 points are required to pass the test. Points are granted individually by each assessor for each evaluation item, and they are cross-checked afterwards. Each sub-item may be marked from 0 to 1 point in five steps (0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00) based on a common evalua- tion file. Exceptions are the ‘CIRAM-based analysis’ sub-items marked from 0 to 2 points in five steps (0.00, 0.50, 1.00, 1.50, 2.00). The acceptable difference between the points granted by assessors for the same evaluation sub-item is 0.25 points (0.50 points in the case of ‘CIRAM‑based analysis’ sub-items). The acceptable difference between the points granted by assessors for the same evaluation item is 0.50 points. The acceptable difference between the total points granted by assessors for the test is 1.0 point. In the case where the difference between assessors is bigger than the accepta- ble difference, negotiations are carried out until the difference is clarified. If no agreement is reached, the sub-items of assessors are both reduced automat- ically to their average until balance is established. The learner receives feed- back/results from the assessment team at the end of the certification session. 3.6.4. Final grade In order to be certified as a CIRAM risk analyst the learner must pass all tests foreseen. In case of failure, the certification session is resumed with the pos- sibility for resit during the next certification session. Such procedure does not involve repeating the course. The learner will be re-examined only in connec- tion with the failed test(s). The final grade is calculated as follows: 54.00 points or more and no failed tests or tests graded as ‘satisfactory’: ‘outstanding’ 43.00 to 53.99 points and no failed tests: ‘good’ 36.00 to 42.99 points and no failed tests: ‘satisfactory’ 35.99 points or less (or/and failed tests): ‘not-compliant’ (failed) Final grade shall be mentioned in the graduation paper. 43",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p43-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 44,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 3.6.5. Final grade chart OUTSTANDING All tests graded as ‘GOOD’ or ‘OUTSTANDING’ and minimum 54.00 points achieved GOOD All tests passed and minimum 43.00 points achieved SATISFACTORY All tests passed and minimum 36.00 points achieved NON-COMPLIANT Test(s) is(are) failed or all tests are passed but the overall points achieved is 35.99 points or below 3.6.6. Assessment methods Test/method Type Weighting Knowledge test (online) Summative 32.25 % Practical test (product development) Summative 32.25 % Analytical test (product critical analysis) Summative 32.25 % Save points (interim evaluations/thesis) Summative 3.25 % 3.6.7. Resit procedure As a resit procedure, in case of failure, the learner will be re-examined at the end of the next course which generally means 6 to 12 months later. Exception- ally, if the assessment team consider as feasible and the learner agrees, re- assessment can be done at the end of the same assessment session. In such case, the learner will lose the right to join the initially planned (official) re-ex- amination session (6 to 12 months later). During resit, the maximum grade to be obtained is ‘satisfactory’. 3.6.8. Course theses Learners are invited to elaborate (in groups of two or individually) a thesis (20–25 pages) on a specific subject (risk analysis related). The subjects are es- tablished at the end of Module II. Following the analysis by the course manage- ment team, Frontex Training Unit may publish the most relevant theses with the support of EC (OPOCE). For every thesis marked by the course manage- ment team as ‘considered to be published’, (up to) 1.00 save point is granted to contributor(s). The point can be used during the official assessment session in any of the planned tests, as needed by the learner. 44",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p44-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 45,
"content": "LIMITED 3. Course design 3.6.9. Save points policy At the start of each centralised module, an interim evaluation is performed (online test). The results of the interim assessments, together with the results of the entry test, are converted up to a maximum of 1 point that can be used during the official assessment session, in any of the planned tests, as needed by the learner (sample calculation: 35 % obtained on the first test + 55 % ob- tained on the second test + 90 % obtained on the third test. Overall average: 60 %. Converted to save points: 0.60 points to be used by the learner in the official assessment session. If we include also the 1.00 save point related to the thesis, a maximum of 2.00 save points can be earned during the course, and these can be used by the learner during the official assessment session. 3.6.10. Selection for the pool of CIRAM main trainers Based on the results obtained (minimum ‘good’) the CIRAM course assessors may select certified CIRAM risk analysts to be taken on board as CIRAM main trainers during any of the future courses. Selected candidates will be asked to complete the train the trainer’s course delivered by Frontex Training Unit. 3.6.11. Calculation of credit points Hours Approximate Calculation of ECTS MI M II M III M IV MV Total (certification) Hours Lecture - 16.00 6.00 7.50 - 29.50 Seminars - 9.00 12.00 10.50 - 31.50 Tutorial (individual training plans) - - 3.00 9.50 - 12.50 Other (daily debriefings) - 2.50 1.00 1.00 8.00 12.50 Assessment 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 23.00 26.00 Revisions - 3.00 7.50 1.00 - 11.50 Experiential 30.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 - 90.00 Total Learning Hours 31.00 50.50 50.50 50.50 31.00 213.50 ECTS (credit points) 9 45",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p45-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 46,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 3.7. Module I design: entry module 3.7.1. Knowledge K To explain the meaning of risk analysis generally and the meaning of 4 integrated border management risk analysis particularly, including the role of CIRAM K To connect the concept of integrated border management risk analysis 4 to various legal provisions in force at EU level K To outline the need to use risk analysis in border management and the 4 importance of a common risk analysis model at EU level SQF LO: Outline a defined range of national, EU and international law, policies, rules and 4 procedures relevant to integrated border management activities. 3.7.2. SQF level Majority of learning outcomes described as level 4. Overall module level: 4 4 3.7.3. Learning strategy Learning strategy considers online delivery of the module, as self-study. Content of the module is made available, via Frontex Virtual Aula, to all po- tential candidates. Future or actual staff working in border management risk analysis offices may enrol online to the entry module following communica- tion with national authorities, as soon as the course is officially declared open. There is no fixed limit in relation to the number of candidates enrolled by each Member State to the entry module. Access to the entry module is granted to all candidates at the same date. Specific ma- terials are available for self-study. However, all materials available under the course platform – at the moment of receiving access to the entry module – shall be treated as supporting materials for the entry exam. The registration period has a duration of 5 weeks. The allocated time granted to study the materials for entry exam is 6 weeks. The entry exam is carried out online, at the same time with all registered learners. A simulation exam is conducted usually 3 weeks in advance in or- der to check if technical specifications required by the platform are met by all stations to be used during the official entry exam. The exam date is commu- nicated in advance to all learners while the exact hour is decided following a 46",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p46-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 47,
"content": "LIMITED 3. Course design questionnaire addressed to all enrolled candidates. The exam has 40 questions (multiple choice) and 50 minutes allocated. The result is revealed to the can- didate immediately after the test, based on the number of points achieved, as ‘shortlisted’ or ‘not shortlisted’. A minimum of 50 % from the total number of points must be achieved in order to be shortlisted. Admission to the course is granted to the candidates that have passed the test, within the limit of available seats (one – exceptionally two candidates per state), based on the result obtained (e.g. if only 15 seats are available, the first 15 candidates in the order of merit will be accepted provided that they are from different states and all of them reached the minimum number of points fore- seen). In case no candidates from a certain state reach the minimum number of points foreseen, the seat is released and may be occupied by a second can- didate from another state (order of merit). In case the balance per participat- ing state is considerably affected following the entry test results, the course management team reserves the right to change the required number of points for admission to 40 %. In case two candidates from the same state have the same score, seconding state will be asked to decide on the final candidate, un- less extra seats can be arranged by Frontex Training Unit. 3.8. Module II design: Basics of risk analysis 3.8.1. Knowledge K To explain the essential role of the intelligence cycle in the field of risk 5 analysis K To justify the broad use of intelligence cycle by the law enforcement 5 community K To describe the intelligence cycle, its elements and concisely the 5 procedures that each element introduces K To describe the analytical tools and techniques that can be used within 5 the scope of risk analysis SQF LO: Describe a defined range of national, EU and international law, policies, rules and 5 procedures relevant to border guarding activities. 47",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p47-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 48,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 3.8.2. Skills S To evaluate sources and information that could be exploited within the 5 scope of risk analysis S To make use of tasking and be able to collect, evaluate, collate, analyse, 5 interpret, report, disseminate and review information S To implement intelligence cycle in the scope of risk analysis 5 S To make use of analytical tools, techniques and services when developing 5 analytical products SQF LO: Apply specialised knowledge and skills in border guarding areas that require 5 specialised professional competences. 3.8.3. Competences C To ensure the reliability, integrity and validity of information collected for 5 risk analysis SQF LO: Ensure implementation of specialised knowledge and skills in border guarding areas 5 that require specialised professional competences. 3.8.4. SQF level Majority of learning outcomes described as level 5. Overall module level: 5 5 3.8.5. Learning strategy Learning strategy considers 5 days of seminars in connection to the entry exam topics and specialised sessions focusing on the intelligence cycle, its elements together with analytical tools, techniques and services. An experiential learn- ing stage at home with a minimum duration of 20 hours before joining mod- ule III is required. Module II includes lectures, seminars and debates moderated by trainers. The learning process is expected to take place around questions and study cases discussed in plenary sessions. Simulation of the competence test is planned to be carried out at the end of the module. Also, at the end of Module II, learners may propose/select the thesis topic. 48",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p48-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 49,
"content": "LIMITED 3. Course design 3.9. Module III design: Models of risk analysis 3.9.1. Knowledge K To describe the main risk analysis concepts in line with CIRAM 5 K To describe threats, vulnerabilities, impact and risks 5 SQF LO: Describe a defined range of national, EU and international law, policies, rules and 5 procedures relevant to border guarding activities. 3.9.2. Skills S To perform CIRAM-based risk analysis 5 S To identify threats, vulnerabilities, impact and risks 5 S To measure threats, vulnerabilities, impact and rate/level risks 5 SQF LO: Apply specialised knowledge and skills in border guarding areas that require 5 specialised professional competences. 3.9.3. Competences C To recommend measures in relation to the identified risks 5 SQF LO: Ensures that CIRAM risk analysts integrate and promote security policies. 5 3.9.4. SQF level Majority of learning outcomes described as level 5. Overall module level: 5 5 3.9.5. Learning strategy Learning strategy considers 5 days of seminars and debates in connection to the Common Risk Analysis Model and its elements. Experiential learning stage at home with a minimum duration of 20 hours before joining Module IV is re- quired. Module III seminars and debates are moderated by trainers. The learn- ing process is expected to take place around questions, role plays and study cases discussed in plenary sessions. Simulation of the practical test is planned to be carried out at the end of the module. Also, at the end of Module III, learn- ers may propose the structure of their thesis. 49",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p49-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 50,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 3.10. Module IV design: applied risk analysis 3.10.1. Knowledge K To describe the concept and the scope of analytical products including 5 their classification K To describe the design principles and protocols to be taken into account 5 when drafting analytical products K To describe the writing styles and techniques to be used depending on the 5 given context SQF Describe a defined range of national, EU and international law, policies, rules and 5 LO: procedures relevant to border guarding activities. 3.10.2. Skills S To elaborate (tailored) analytical products within the scope of integrated 5 border management following the organisational needs and the operational situations S To present analytical products, within the scope of integrated border 5 management, to operational or managerial staff SQF LO: Apply specialised knowledge and skills in border guarding areas that require 5 specialised professional competences. 3.10.3 Competences C To ensure the quality of analytical products within the scope of integrated 5 border management, presented to operational or managerial staff, as a basis for decision making SQF LO: Ensures that CIRAM risk analysts integrate and promote security policies. 3.10.4. SQF level Majority of learning outcomes described as level 5. Overall module level: 5 5 3.10.5. Learning strategy Learning strategy considers a mix of sessions that must be delivered in or- der to enable the learner to develop analytical products, following the rules/ practices gained during the first three modules. Module includes lectures, 50",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p50-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 51,
"content": "LIMITED 3. Course design seminars and practical sessions. Individual mentoring sessions and consulta- tions are foreseen. During day I of the fourth module an interim evaluation is carried out (online test). Following the 5 days centralised training an experiential learning phase takes place in the home state of the learner. This experiential learning phase involves 30 hours of learning where the knowledge and skills acquired in the contact weeks are applied. 3.11. Others 3.11.1. Plagiarism policy It is expected that all homework assignments, papers, theses, and examina- tions and any other work submitted will be the learner’s own. Learners should always take care to distinguish their own ideas and knowledge from informa- tion derived from sources. Quotations must be placed properly within quota- tion marks and must be cited fully. In addition, all paraphrased material must be acknowledged completely. The responsibility for learning the proper forms of citation lies with the individual learner. Learners are expected to be famil- iar with this policy. Learners who, for whatever reason, submit work either not their own or without clear attribution to its sources will be subject to re- quirement to withdraw from the course or have the certification cancelled (if facts are identified after the course). 3.11.2. Annexes Module I and II schedule Module III schedule Module IV schedule Assessment session schedule Sample of analytical test 51",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p51-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 52,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 52",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p52-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 53,
"content": "3. Course design Content of Modules 4 53",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p53-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 54,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 54",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p54-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 55,
"content": "LIMITED 4. Content of modules 4. Content of modules Module I: Entry module (revision) Chapter: Risk analysis within integrated border management Module II | 1st day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Official opening. Self-introduction of The non-disclosed Frontex Project 0.5 hours others part contains participants. Manager personal data, in 1 hours lecture What is a CIRAM risk analyst? RAU particular the Training and certification of CIRAM risk analysts representative names of individuals. The 10:30-11:00 Break disclosure would undermine the 11:00-12:30 Introduction to risk analysis: concept, scope, protection Course team of 1.5 hour lecture types of risk analysis privacy and the integrity of the Place of risk analysis under EU IBM (Frontex | individual, in EU MS | SAC) particular in accordance with Development of risk analysis under Schengen European Union Acquis legislation regarding the 12:30-13:30 Lunch break protection of 13:30-15:00 EBCG Regulation and the development of the personalteam Course data and 1.5 hour lecture therefore has to Common Integrated Risk Analysis Model be precluded Basics of CIRAM pursuant to Article 4(1)(b) of 15:00-15:30 Break Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001. 15:30-17:00 Summary of the day Course team 1.5 hour seminar 55",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p55-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 56,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts Module II: Basics of risk analysis Chapter I: Intelligence cycle Module II | 2nd day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Information vs intelligence Course team 1.5 hour lecture Types of information and types of sources 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Evaluation of information Course team 1.5 hour lecture Evaluation of sources 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Applied theory: types of information and types Course team 1.5 hour seminar of sources 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:00 Applied theory: evaluation of information and Course team 1.5 hour seminar evaluation of sources Module II | 3rd day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Meaning, scope and model of intelligence cycle Course team 1.5 hour lecture Intelligence cycle: tasking Intelligence cycle: collection 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Intelligence cycle: evaluation Course team 1.5 hour lecture Intelligence cycle: collation Intelligence cycle: analysis and interpretation 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Intelligence cycle: reporting Course team 1.5 hour lecture Intelligence cycle: dissemination Intelligence cycle: review Intelligence cycle: implementation 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:00 Intelligence cycle: applied theory Course team 1.5 hour seminar 56",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p56-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 57,
"content": "LIMITED 4. Content of modules Chapter II: Analytical toolbox Module II | 4th day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Meaning and relevance of supporting tools Course team 1.5 hours lecture Selection of supporting tools 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Meaning and relevance of supporting Course team 1.5 hours lecture techniques Most common supporting techniques (data collection, creative thinking) 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Applied theory: tools and techniques Course team 1.5 hours seminar 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:00 Applied theory: tools and techniques Course team 1.5 hours seminar Module I and II: Revision and administrative issues Modules I and II | 5th day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Eurosur Fusion Services Course team 1.5 hours lecture 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Modules I and II: revision Course team 1.5 hours revision 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Modules I and II: revision Course team 1.5 hours revision 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:30 Assignment of thesis Course team 2.0 hours others Closure of Module II 57",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p57-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 58,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts Module I summary Type Number of hours Lectures - hours Seminars - hours Tutorials - hours Others - hours Assessment 1.00 hour Revisions - hours Experiential 30.00 hours (online study) TOTAL 31.00 hours Module II summary Type Number of hours Lectures 16.00 hours Seminars 9.00 hours Tutorials - hours Others 2.50 hours Assessment - hours Revisions 3.00 hours Experiential 20.00 hours (to be performed between module II and module III, in home states) TOTAL 50.50 hours 58",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p58-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 59,
"content": "LIMITED 4. Content of modules Module III: Models of risk analysis Chapter I: Revision Module III | 1st day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Opening Course team 0.5 hours others Interim evaluation 1.0 hours evaluation 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Interim evaluation Course team 1.5 hours revision 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Interim evaluation Course team 1.5 hours revision 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:00 Interim evaluation Course team 1.5 hours revision Chapter II: Threat assessment | vulnerability assessment Module III | 2nd day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Models of risk analysis. CIRAM analysis Course team 1.5 hours lecture concepts. Identifying | Describing | Measuring a threat 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Identifying | Describing | Measuring a threat Course team 1.5 hours seminar 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Identifying | Describing | Measuring a Course team 1.5 hours lecture vulnerability 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:00 Identifying | Describing | Measuring a Course team 1.5 hours seminar vulnerability 59",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p59-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 60,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts Chapter III: Impact assessment | risk assessment Module III | 3rd day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Identifying | Describing | Measuring the impact Course team 1.5 hours lecture 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Identifying | Describing | Measuring the impact Course team 1.5 hours seminar 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Identifying | Describing | Rating a risk Course team 1.5 hours lecture 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:00 Identifying | Describing | Rating a risk Course team 1.5 hours seminar Chapters I and II and III: practice Module III | 4th day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 CIRAM-based risk analysis: applied theory Course team 1.5 hours seminar 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 CIRAM-based risk analysis: applied theory Course team 1.5 hours seminar 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 CIRAM-based risk analysis: applied theory Course team 1.5 hours seminar 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:00 CIRAM-based risk analysis: applied theory Course team 1.5 hours seminar 60",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p60-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 61,
"content": "LIMITED 4. Content of modules Module III: Revision and administrative issues Module III | 5th day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Module III: Revision Course team 1.5 hours revision 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Module III: Revision Course team 1.5 hours revision 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Thesis development Course team 1.5 hours tutorial 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:30 Thesis development Course team 1.5 hours tutorial Closure of Module III 0.5 hours others Module III summary Type Number of hours Lectures 6.00 hours Seminars 12.00 hours Tutorials 3.00 hours Others 1.00 hours Assessment 1.00 hours Revisions 7.50 hours Experiential 20.00 hours (to be performed between module II and module III, in home states) TOTAL 50.50 hours 61",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p61-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 62,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts Module IV: Applied risk analysis Chapter I: Introduction to analytical products Module IV | 1st day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Interim evaluation Course team 0.5 hours others 1 hour assessment 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Interim evaluation Course team 1.5 hours revision 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Concept of purpose of analytical product(s) Course team 1.5 hour lecture Design principles and protocols 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:00 Writing styles and techniques Course team 1.5 hour lecture Chapter II: Main analytical products Module IV | 2nd day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Periodical risk analysis reports Course team 1.5 hours lecture Tailored risk analysis reports 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Applied theory: periodical/tailored risk analysis Course team 1.5 hours seminar reports 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Applied theory: periodical/tailored risk analysis Course team 1.5 hours seminar reports 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:00 Applied theory: periodical/tailored risk analysis Course team 1.5 hours seminar reports 62",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p62-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 63,
"content": "LIMITED 4. Content of modules Chapter II: Main analytical products Module IV | 3rd day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Briefing analytical notes Course team 1.5 hours lecture Risk profiles Alerts 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Applied theory: briefing analytical notes/risk Course team 1.5 hours seminar profiles/alerts 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Applied theory: briefing analytical notes/risk Course team 1.5 hours seminar profiles/alerts 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:00 Applied theory: briefing analytical notes/risk Course team 1.5 hours seminar profiles/alerts Chapter III: Eurosur analytical products and exam simulations Module IV | 4th day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Eurosur analysis layer Key developments Best practices Course team 1.5 hours lecture Briefing note and analytical monitor report Earth observation report Supporting analytical report 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Eurosur analysis layer Key developments Best practices Course team 1.5 hours seminar Briefing note and analytical monitor report Earth observation report Supporting analytical report 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Simulation of the analytical test Course team 1.5 hours tutorial 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:00 Simulation of the analytical test Course team 1.5 hours tutorial 63",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p63-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 64,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts Module IV: Exam simulations and administrative issues Module IV | 5th day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Simulation of the practical test Course team 1.5 hours tutorial 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Simulation of the practical test Course team 1.5 hours tutorial 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Status of thesis Course team 1.5 hours tutorial 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:30 Status of thesis Course team 1.5 hours tutorial Closure of Module IV 0.5 hours other Module IV summary Type Number of hours Lectures 7.50 hours Seminars 10.50 hours Tutorials 9.50 hours Others 1.00 hours Assessment 1.00 hours Revisions 1.00 hours Experiential 20.00 hours (to be performed between module IV and certification session, in home states) TOTAL 50.50 hours 64",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p64-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 65,
"content": "LIMITED 4. Content of modules Assessment and certification session 4th week | 1st day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Exam: Knowledge test Students 1.5 hours (including publication of results) assessment 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Preparation of practical test Assessment 1.5 hours others (computer based | report drafting) team 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-17:00 Exam: practical test Students 3.5 hours (computer based | report drafting) assessment 4th week | 2nd day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Exam: analytical test Assessment 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) team assessment 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Exam: analytical test Assessment 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) team assessment 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Exam: analytical test Assessment 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) team assessment 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-18:00 Exam: analytical test Assessment 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) team assessment 65",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p65-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 66,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts Assessment and certification session 4th week | 3rd day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Exam: analytical test Students 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) assessment 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Exam: analytical test Students 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) assessment 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Exam: analytical test Students 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) assessment 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:30 Exam: analytical test Students 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) assessment 4th week | 4th day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:30-10:30 Exam: analytical test Students 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) assessment 10:30-11:00 Break 11:00-12:30 Exam: analytical test Students 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) assessment 12:30-13:30 Lunch break 13:30-15:00 Exam: analytical test Students 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) assessment 15:00-15:30 Break 15:30-17:30 Exam: analytical test Students 1.5 hours (report analysis | interpretation) assessment 66",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p66-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 67,
"content": "LIMITED 4. Content of modules Assessment and certification session 4th week | 5th day Time slot Activity Performed by Type and duration 09:00-10:30 Publication of results Assessment 1.5 hours others (practical and analytical) team 10:30-11:00 Break (preparation) 11:00-12:30 Checking experiential learning records and Assessment 1.5 hours others status of thesis. team Collecting individual signatures. 12:30-13:30 Lunch break (preparation for afternoon session) 13:30-15:00 Prepare certification documents for CIRAM risk Assessment 1.5 hours others analysts. team 15:00-15:30 Break (preparation) 15:30-17:30 Handout ceremony. Closure. All staff 2.0 hours others Assessment session summary Type Number of hours Lectures – Seminars – Tutorials – Others 8.00 hours Assessment 23.00 hours Revisions – Experiential – TOTAL 31.00 hours 67",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p67-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 68,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts Course summary Hours MV Total Approximate Calculation of ECTS MI M II M III M IV (certification) Hours Lecture - 16.00 6.00 7.50 - 29.50 Seminars - 9.00 12.00 10.50 - 31.50 Tutorial (individual training plans) - - 3.00 9.50 - 12.50 Other (daily debriefings) - 2.50 1.00 1.00 8.00 12.50 Assessment 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 23.00 26.00 Revisions - 3.00 7.50 1.00 - 11.50 Experiential 30.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 - 90.00 Total Learning Hours 31.00 50.50 50.50 50.50 31.00 213.50 ECTS (credit points) 8.5 68",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p68-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 69,
"content": "4. Content of modules Sample of study case 5 69",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p69-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 70,
"content": "Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 70",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p70-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 71,
"content": "LIMITED 5. Sample of study case 5. Sample of study case European Course for CIRAM risk analysts [year] Assessment session [location], [date] A risk analyst is tasked to analyse a border security situation in a wide geo- graphic area that also includes border sections between third countries. The results of the analysis should contribute to political-level decision-making be- fore an important summit considering border policies. As the project is a large one, the analyst starts to plan the project in cooper- ation with their own manager. The deadline is very tight considering the wide scope of the analysis. Moreover, there is a regular periodical assessment on illegal border crossings to be drafted for the regional level commanders just 1 day before the deadline. The analyst reports that, given the deadlines, only limited time may be allocated to work on this project. The analyst also knows that there will be no reliable quantitative data available on border sections be- tween third countries, because cooperation and information exchange with these particular countries is not functioning. Therefore the analyst asks man- agement for the analysis of those border sections to be dropped from the planned scope of analysis. Please read the case with the assigned working group, identify the problem(s) and provide your common feedback (including possible solutions). 71",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p71-{size}.png"
},
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/156095/?format=api",
"number": 72,
"content": "LIMITED Frontex European course for CIRAM risk analysts 72",
"width": 1749,
"height": 2481,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/d4/06/ab/d406ababfc9349fb9053d990dcb852e2/page-p72-{size}.png"
}
]
}
