HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"resource_uri": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238028/",
"id": 238028,
"site_url": "https://fragdenstaat.de/dokumente/238028-t05-216-menoa-work-plan/",
"title": "T05-216-MENOA Work plan",
"slug": "t05-216-menoa-work-plan",
"description": "",
"published_at": null,
"num_pages": 1,
"public": true,
"listed": true,
"allow_annotation": false,
"pending": false,
"file_url": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/82/33/2e/82332ec7d7014bc59bce204bf6abe8e3/t05-216-menoa-work-plan.pdf",
"file_size": 2923139,
"cover_image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/82/33/2e/82332ec7d7014bc59bce204bf6abe8e3/page-p1-small.png",
"page_template": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/82/33/2e/82332ec7d7014bc59bce204bf6abe8e3/page-p{page}-{size}.png",
"outline": "",
"properties": {
"title": "T05-216-MENOA Work plan.pdf.pdf",
"author": "barribe",
"_tables": [],
"creator": null,
"subject": null,
"producer": "Microsoft: Print To PDF",
"_format_webp": true
},
"uid": "82332ec7-d701-4bc5-9bce-204bf6abe8e3",
"data": {},
"pages_uri": "/api/v1/page/?document=238028",
"original": null,
"foirequest": null,
"publicbody": null,
"last_modified_at": "2023-05-19 14:35:49.380882+00:00",
"pages": [
{
"document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238028/",
"number": 1,
"content": "ERI Rer. Ares(20203944481 - 1370272020\n\nUpdated MENOA Workplan Feb 2019\n\n \n\nKey\n\n \n\nTasks impiemented| |\nDeliverables submitted/ Meetings orevents| |\n'Remaining tasks] I\n\n \n\n \n \n\n \n\nRemaining deliverables/ meetings or events —\n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n\nProjeetvear3 Be re ae ‘\n\n \n \n \n\n1. EU TF NOA M&E Framework Development\n\n \n \n \n\n1.1 Aligning NOA M&E framework with the structure ofthe EUTF Sahel and HoA windows\n\n \n \n\nR 1.1.1 Initiatives implemented under |1.2 Up-date of !Os and Result matrix\nthe EUTF NOA are logically consistent\n\nJand in line with the programme's m\n\nintervention logic 11.4 Check lists for IPs and EU DEL |]\n\n \n\nx x 5 SHAMEHTTEEEENN |Assumes need to align variables and potentialiy analytic approach\n8& 5 with Sahel and HoA to produce cross-window portrait\nN [Assumes further update in 2019 to support for cross-window\nSS] jalignment and reporting; Year 3 for potential refinement to address\nm\" En -H >\n\nInternal tool to ensure IP LF alignment with EUTF NOA framework\njand consistency across IPs\nInternal too| to support team consistency of process and quality\nassurance\n‚For example, coordination and QA\n\n3. Support to IPs: Action Fiche and Log Frame Alignment.\n\n13.1 Action Fiche and DOA review and alignment 'I-ITLET1T Rs J\nF Jassume DG NEAR will contract new projects in NOA thru MENOA\n13:2 Log frame review and alignment\nee ee price end andnewAr. DA, Lwilsenute age (olowing\n\nEss 6 NEAR instruction)\nPRepafeer]P|\n\n \n\n \n\n11.3 Finalisation of French translation\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\nELSE ES ED cn\n\n[2.1 Finalisation of “logframer”\n\n \n\n \n\nRLLIN ives implemented under\nIthe EUTF NOA are logicalty consistent\nJand in line with the programme's\n\nintervention lo 2.3 Other processes\n\n \n\n2.2 Internal guidelines\n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n \n\n13.3 Review of consistency log frame and DoA and Action Fiche\n\n \n\n[3.4 Phone support on log frames and indicators\nAssume in-person support to IPs can be combined with regional\nlevents 7.3\nAssume one mission 10 Morocco in Dec.; Assume combined with\n3.5, 4,9,5.8 and 7.3 possible\n\n13.5 In-person support on log frames and indicators\n[R 1.1.1 Initiatives implemented under\nthe EUTF NOA are logically consistent |3.6 Up-dating of guidelines for IPs\nJand in line with the programme's\nintensantion ogi 13.7 Translation of guidelines for IPs\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\n \n\n4. Support to DG NEAR and other EU institutions, e.g. EU DEL\n\n \n\n[4.1 Development of EUTF cross-window Theory of Change (with Altai) | [Completed in July\n\n \n\n \n\n|Completed in Sept but assume time needed end of Year 2 to review\n\n14.2 Review of revised Theory of Change any revisions to TOC and/or outputs of midterm evaluation\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n|Assume external EUTF mid-term evaluation will start beginning of\n\n[4.3 Support to EUTF midterm external evaluator\n12013; Assume need to explain NOA framework to external evaluator\\\n\n \n\n[4.4 Coordination with other EU TF windows\n\n \n\n|Assume need to map NOA outcome indicators with Sahel and HoA\n\n[4.5 Development and alignment of EUTF macro output in.\nlouteome indicators including to support the external evaluation\n\n \n\n-ators and NOA outcome indicators\n\n \n\n[4.6 Regutarly scheduled phone mtgs with DG NEAR\n\n[4.7 Ad hoc TA phone mtgs arte\n\nR 2.1.1 EU headquarters, EU 14.8 Ad-hoc in-person TA mtgs\ndelegations and project implementers\nhave increased knowledge and skills\n\nthe area of project design, monitoring\nae 14.10 Other ad-hoc activities 2 ISISIDE 4 4 es 1 1 ‚JAssume additional ad-hoc needs for TA and support\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n[Assume one mission to Morocco in Dec.; Assume mission can be\n|combined with 3,5, 4.9,5.8 and 7.3\n\n \n\nIn-person introduction to NOA M&E framework, data collection and reporting for EU DEL\n\n \n\nI\n\n \n\nER IN 22 2102206 1 Tel 00.7\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5.1 Review and completion of project data entered into AKVO\n\n \n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n\nUpdate template, database, guidelines to reflect new conditions in\nthe field\n\nI | BEENDEN\n\n \n\n[5.2 Analytic database development (quantitative data)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n15.3 Development of template for IPs for the reporting of data on outputs and IOs (customized)\n\n \n\n[5.4 Development of guidelines for template for IPs for the reporting of data on outputs and IOs\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5.5 Test of database and template for reporting\n\n \n \n\n \n\n/Assumes that findings ofthe test phase will require some\nrefinements but not major adapta\n\n \n \n\n5.6 Adaptation of database and template for reporting\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5.7 Database development (Qualitative data)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n[R 1.1.3 Procedures for data collection\njand reporting are defined and in place\n\n[Assumes dissemination via weblinks to the appropriate website, to\n\n15.8 Research /draft of examples of tools for data collection (questionnaires, etc.)\ncreate continuous access\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n[Assumes one mission to Morocco in Dec. 2018 and combining this\nwith 3.5, 4.9,5.8 and 7.3 if/as possible\n\n[| Assumes tmely and consistent receipt of data from IPs\n\n \n\n5.9 In-person support to IPs on data collection and reporting\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5.10 Data receipt, review, cleaning, data entry and layout\n\nR1.2.1 Data for the defined indicators |5.11 Data requests to IPs (for missing data)\nare collected regularly\n\n6. Regional and national monitoring data analysis and reporting\n\n \n\n \n\n16.1 Research of relevant data collections\n\n \n\n16.2 Cooperation with MEDHIN\n\n \n\nS questionnaire\n\n \n\n[R1.2.1 Data for the defined indicators\n\\are collected rı\n\n \n\n16.3 Organization of data ideı ies ofthe NoA window\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nJassumes that not all projects will\n\n\\assumes IPs provide DG NEAR with narrative and flash reports on a\n|regular, on-going basis and DG NEAR sends to ICMPD\n\n[6.4 Descriptive analysis (frequencies and cross tabs) of monitoring data (outputs and where available, 105) -oncluded by the end of year 3\n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n \n\n16.5 Preparation of data table and other data displays for reporting t not all projects will be concluded by the end of year 3\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nIR 1.2.2 Data for the defined indicators |6-$ Qualitative data analysis (of flash reports and other narrative reports)\n\nlare processed regularly\n\n \n\n \n\n6.7 Preparation of analytic reports (regional level)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n5 Assumes incorporation into annual report\n\n[Rı23R ortingisensured _|6.8 Preparation of analytic reports (national level) ‚umes incorporation into annual report\n\n7. Learning activities\n\n|R 1.2.4 External evaluations are\nnducted in line with international |7.1 Development of mid-term and/or final project evaluation report outline templates for IPs. |Assumes IPs need a tool/template for their project-level evaluations]\nKauslunia standards\n\nke:: EU headquarters, EU 7.2 Development of concept for two regional M&E events workshops\n\\delegations and project implementers\n\n|have increased knowledge and skills i\nthe area of project design, monitoring |7.3 Facilitation of two regional M&E events/workshops\nland evaluation\n\nel UL nn\n17.4 Collection of lessons learned (during in-person meetings or structured telephone discussions with EU\nDEL, DG NEAR and IPs)\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n;sumes can be combined with 3.5, 4.9, 5.8 and 7.3 where possible\n\n \n\n \n\n|Assumes components of in-person mtgs devoted to discussions of\nNessons learned and if needed, structured phone di\njensure robust data for analysis\n\nssumes end of project collection and analysis of lessons learned;\nformat T8D with DG NEAR\n\n \n\nR 2.2.1 Lessons learned and\njexperiences gained in the course ofthe\n|MEE of the initiatives implemented are\n|systematized and accessible for all\nIstakeholders\n\n \n\n7.5 Preparation of lessons learned document\n\n \n\n \n\n \n \n\n17.6 Website with FAQs and documents related to the NOA M&E framework\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nssumes all tools developed to supports IPs (e.g. 5.7) posted via\n|web link to appropriate website in June 2019\n\nALS TE TIL Er rn13\n\n[Regular (monthiy) internal coordination mtgs with other ICMPD\n|projects in NOA, for example with Malta Office and JVAP team\njengaged in NOA projects\n\n|MENOA team meets weekly to maintain project tasks, timeline and\n|eommunication\n\n|Sub-teams to develop new tools, learning sessions, or presentations\n\n|and conduct QA, among other tasks\n\n \n \n \n \n \n\n[8.1 Coordination wıth ICMPD\n\n \n\n[8.2 Team mtgs\n\n \n\n.3 Sub-team migs\n\n9. Project management\n\n9.1 Project set-up and closure\n\n \n\n9.2 Project management\n\n \n \n\n[On-going and incorporated into all activities to ensure high-auality\ndeliverabies, for example, aligned log frames, data base, analysis\nInd report\n\nen TIER ee\n\n19.3 Quality Assurance\n\n \n\n19.4 Project Steering Committee Mtgs\n\n‚umes on-going communication (enai Phone): and regular report]\n\n9.5 Project reporting |to DG NEAR\n\n \n\n \n\nNot applicable",
"width": 2480,
"height": 3508,
"image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/82/33/2e/82332ec7d7014bc59bce204bf6abe8e3/page-p1-{size}.png"
}
]
}
