GET /api/v1/document/238033/
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "resource_uri": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
    "id": 238033,
    "site_url": "https://fragdenstaat.de/dokumente/238033-menoa-progress-report_q32020docx-_redacted/",
    "title": "MENOA Progress Report_Q3.2020.docx-_Redacted",
    "slug": "menoa-progress-report_q32020docx-_redacted",
    "description": "",
    "published_at": null,
    "num_pages": 25,
    "public": true,
    "listed": true,
    "allow_annotation": false,
    "pending": false,
    "file_url": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/menoa-progress-report_q32020docx-_redacted.pdf",
    "file_size": 1279147,
    "cover_image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p1-small.png",
    "page_template": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p{page}-{size}.png",
    "outline": "",
    "properties": {
        "title": "MENOA Progress Report_Q3.2020.docx.pdf",
        "author": "barribe",
        "_tables": [
            {
                "page": 1,
                "order": 1,
                "accuracy": 100.0,
                "whitespace": 10.0
            },
            {
                "page": 1,
                "order": 2,
                "accuracy": 100.0,
                "whitespace": 8.33
            }
        ],
        "creator": null,
        "subject": null,
        "producer": "Microsoft: Print To PDF",
        "_format_webp": true
    },
    "uid": "3182f236-3fe5-46a7-9d5c-846387785874",
    "data": {},
    "pages_uri": "/api/v1/page/?document=238033",
    "original": null,
    "foirequest": null,
    "publicbody": null,
    "last_modified_at": "2023-05-19 14:35:50.989839+00:00",
    "pages": [
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 1,
            "content": "Funded by the European Union\n\n\n\n\nQUARTERLY NARRATIVE UPDATE Q3-2020\n                               Development of a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the\nProject Title                  North of Africa Window of the European Union Emergency Trust Fund\n                               for Africa (MENOA)\nContract/Reference Nr.         T05-EUTF-NOA-REG-03-01\nProject Reporting\n                               01 July 2020 30 September 2020\nPeriod\nContact Person                                                                               ICMPD\n\nTelephone\n\n\nKey Project Data\n\nCountries                               Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Tunisia\n                                        Directorate-General for European Neighbourhood Policy and\nDonor\n                                        Enlargement Negotiations (DG NEAR), European Commission\n                                           DG NEAR\n                                           EU Delegations in Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, and\n                                           Morocco\nProject partners\n                                                      Implementing Partners in North Africa\n                                           DG DEVCO\n                                           Altai\nTotal project duration                  14.11.2017 - 14.02.2021 (39 months\n\nTotal project budget                    EUR 2.118.036\n\nSUMMARY\n\nThis quarterly report covers progress and results on the service contract Development of a\nMonitoring and Evaluation Framework for the North of Africa Window of the European Union\nEmergency Trust Fund for Africa (MENOA) for the period 01 July 2020, to 30 September 2020. The\nMENOA contract is funded by the European Union, overseen by DG NEAR and implemented by the\nInternational Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD).\n\nAs in previous reporting periods, Q3 2020 featured significant progress on several key planned\noutputs and outcomes for MENOA\n\n          (Section 1) EU Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF) North of Africa (NOA) Action Fiche and\n          Implementing Partner (IP) log frame development and alignment\n          (Section 2) Data collection tools (DCT) update and preparation\n          (Section 3) AKVO data entry on EUTF common output indicators (COIs)\n\n                                                     1",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p1-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 2,
            "content": "Funded by the European Union\n\n\n\n\n          (Section 4) Technical inputs on DG DEVCO revised definitions to COIs for the Horn of Africa\n          and Sahel and Lake Chad window\n          (Section 5) Integration of DG NEAR and EU Delegation feedback on EUTF NOA Monitoring\n          Reports 2 and 3 (NMR2 and NMR3)\n          (Section 6) Development and data collection for the MENOA Lessons Learned report on the\n          development, operationalisation and use of the EUTF NOA Monitoring and Learning System\n          (MLS)\n          (Section 7) Ongoing engagement and exchange with the eMGPP team to develop data\n          sources for the EUTF NOA specific and strategic objectives\n          Annex: updated MENOA log frame reporting progress on the MENOA output and outcome\n          indicators\n\nPROJECT STRUCTURES\n\nNo-Cost Extension (NCE) Submission\nIn consultation with DG NEAR, the MENOA team submitted a formal request for a three-month no-\ncost extension, until 14 February 2021. Following unintended delays related to the COVID-19\npandemic and resulting restrictions as well as DG NEAR requests for unplanned key ad hoc technical\ndeliverables, the team made this request to ensure the delivery of all planned analyses and\ndeliverables before project end.\n\nProject structures\n     Continuation of weekly ICMPD MENOA team meetings to review progress, identify challenges,\n     and brainstorm solutions\n     Continuation of regular check-in meetings with DG NEAR to discuss on-going project activities\n     and results\n                                                                            including IPs and Action\n     Fiches log frame alignments.\n     Continuation of Contract planning and monitoring spreadsheet updates to keep DG NEAR\n     informed on the status of IP log frame alignments, AKVO data input, and DCT development\n     Continuation of regular discussions with NOA EUDs to increase communication on IPs progress\n     and data collection\n     Development of lessons learned methodology, data collection and initial analysis\n     Further improvement and updates to DCTs customised to each project log frame.\n     NMR revisions\n     Technical Memos on COIs\nMENOA IMPLEMENTATION AND RESULTS\n\nThis section provides detailed information on MENOA project activities and results during Q3 2020.\nEach topic concludes with the named results and outputs to which the work contributed as identified\nin the contract log frame. Annex 1 reports on project progress on and achievement of results against\nindicators in the MENOA log frame.\n                                                   2",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p2-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 3,
            "content": "Funded by the European Union\n\n\n\n\n 1. Log frame development and alignment\n\nIn close cooperation with IPs of both existing and new EUTF funded projects, the ICMPD team\ncontinued to support IPs in aligning their EUTF NOA project log frames with the EUTF strategic and\nspecific objectives.\nBeyond aligning projects with the EUTF NOA strategic and specific objectives, the team continued to\nsupport IPs to choose, define, refine and/or focus their outputs and immediate outcomes as well as\ndevelop a relevant, comprehensive set of paired indicators. This included regular video / phone\nmeetings and email conversations to align project log frames and to identify the most pertinent\noutputs, outcomes, and indicators at each level. This work contributed to ensuring a coherent\napproach and use of the MLS in NOA as well as building IP, DG NEAR and EUD staff capacity on the\ndevelopment and use of the MLS.\nDuring Q3 2020, the team, in cooperation with the respective EUDs, worked on the alignment or the\nreview of several EUTF NOA-funded projects, most notably including several new COVID-19 actions in\nLibya. ICMPD worked closely on alignments with UNHCR Morocco, WHO (several Libya actions), GIZ,\nUNICEF, Caritas, and IOM.\nThis work contributed to Result 1.1.1 Initiatives implemented under the EUTF NOA are logically\nconsistent and in line with the p\nfiches, DoAs and log frames reviewed, commented and aligned with the MLS. It also relied upon the\n\n\n\n\n 2. Data collection tools (DCT) preparation\n\nA total of 27 tailor-made DCTs were sent to IPs during this reporting period. More DCTs were\nprepared than those sent out, due to pending clarifications and confirmations of log frame-related\nchanges, inconsistencies, or pending contracting for some already aligned projects.\nAlongside the sent DCTs, IPs were encouraged to submit their qualitative reports and were\nencouraged to use the non-obligatory narrative reporting template developed by ICMPD. The\npurpose of the template is to help guide IP reporting and ensure a comprehensive set of comparable\ndata for analysis and inclusion in the NMRs. The use of this template/tool remains optional to\nsupport the favoured flexible approach to reporting for the MLS and to ensure that it does not\nbecome an additional burden for those IPs with well-established reporting procedures in place.\nThis work contributed to Result 1.1.2 Technical system for the processing of data and reporting in line\nwith the MLS is in place; and Result 1.1.4 Data for the defined indicators are collected, processed and\nreported regularly. It also delivered Output 1.1.3.1 Template for IPs for the reporting of data on\noutputs and IOs (customised) based on the previously delivered Output 1.1.2.1 Database for\nquantitative monitoring data set up. Follow-up support has also contributed significantly to Output\n1.1.4.4 In-person support to IPs on data collection and reporting, albeit online due to consequences of\nCovid-19.\n\n                                                  3",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p3-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 4,
            "content": "Funded by the European Union\n\n\n\n\n    3.   AKVO data entry on project common output indicators (COIs)\n\nIn July and August, the MENOA team conducted a review and update of entries on the AKVO\nplatform. This entailed the creation of new profiles for projects which have been contracted since the\nlast reporting period using the final contracted DoAs as reference. Given some technical constraints\ndue to which some published profiles were still not visible to the public, the MENOA team\ncoordinated with AKVO RsR support to rectify this issue. In August 2020, the MENOA team updated\nthe result and/or target values for the 32 distinct EUTF NOA-supported projects. All 3 projects under\nLY-05 action fiche were published and checked during this time.\nIn early Q4 2020,                                                                   ated DCTs sent by\nthe October 2020 deadline for inclusion in NMR4.\nThis work contributed to Result 1.1.4. Data for the defined indicators are collected, processed and\nreported regularly\n\n\n    4. Technical input on EUTF NOA Common Output Indicators (COIs)\n\nIn Q2, the team had developed                                                       several proposed\nCOVID-19 indicators (see 5 in Quarterly report 2) 1.\nDuring Q3, DG DEVCO compiled and shared a set of proposed revisions to the definitions and\ndisaggregations for the SLC and HOA windows into a                            . DG NEAR\n\nCOI definitions, even though they are not relevant to the NOA window. As was established in 2018,\nDG NEAR supported and launched projects in NOA earlier than in the other windows. As projects\nwere funded, the ICMPD MENOA team supported IPs and DG NEAR to align these projects with the\nEUTF NOA strategic and specific objectives. As such, these projects were implemented before the\nCOIs were developed. To ensure continuity in reporting, the ICMPD MENOA team worked with the\nIPs to choose 1 to 3 COIs and add them to IP log frames for reporting. DG NEAR and DG DEVCO\nagreed that once HoA and SLC windows began implementing, they would use a different approach to\nthe COIs since the advanced stage of project implementation in NOA and the well-established NOA\nmonitoring system meant that it was not possible to change NOA IP COIs without compromising the\ncontinuity and comparability of the data IPs had already begun to collect and report.\nDG NEAR asked the ICMPD MENOA team to provide feedback on                   definitions and\nmethodological notes for in the SLC and HOA windows as a technical support and to increase\n                                    .\nDirectly resulting from the work initiated earlier by DG DEVCO, the European Commission introduced\nand communicated a methodological note to all EUTF IPs detailing the changes to the 41 common\noutput indicators (COI) on 15 July 2020.\n\n1\n ICMPD feedback on additional proposed revisions to EUTF common output indicators\ndisaggregation definitions (sent 24 june 2020)\n                                                                4",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p4-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 5,
            "content": "Funded by the European Union\n\n\n\n\nGiven its dissemination to all EUTF IPs, including NOA, and the need for coherent monitoring across\nall three windows, the MENOA team developed a structured approach to the changes in COIs in NOA.\nTo address the challenges, the team communicated a note to DG NEAR on 14 September to highlight\nthe nature of the changes, raise potential issues and to propose a sound and participatory approach\nthat will ensure sufficient stability and coherency in the reporting.\nThis work contributed to Result 1.1.4. Data for the defined indicators are collected, processed and\nreported regularly.\n\n\n 5. Integration of DG NEAR and EU Delegations feedback on EUTF NOA Monitoring Report 2 and 3\n    (NMR2 and NMR3)\n\nNMR2: After incorporating multiple rounds of comments from DG NEAR, IPs and EUDs, including a\n\nsent it to DG NEAR for dissemination to stakeholders and publication on the EUTF website2.\nNMR3: As mentioned, the ICMPD MENOA team delivered a comprehensive draft of NMR3 to DG\nNEAR on deadline (15 June 2020) in Q2 2020. During Q3, the team integrated several rounds of\n                                                                                              g\n                                                               3\nthe six months between 15 October 2019 and 15 April 2020 , the report offers insights into the\nprogress on results, challenges encountered and lessons learned from implementation of the EUTF\nNOA strategy and initiatives in the region. Among other analyses, the report provides an initial\n                                                -19 resulting challenges4.\nThis work contributed to Result 1.1.4 Data for the defined indicators are collected, processed and\nreported regularly; and delivered Output 1.1.4.8 Analytic reports (regional level) and Output 1.1.4.9\nAnalytic reports (national level) for 2019.\n\n\n 6. Development and data collection for the MENOA Lessons Learned report on the\n    development, operationalisation and use of the EUTF NOA Monitoring and Learning System\n    (MLS)\n\nThe team started implementing a series of activities to support the drafting of a Lessons learned\nreport focused on the EUTF NOA MLS and supporting processes. This analysis will (1) capture insights\non the development, launch, implementation and learning from an MLS for on a large-scale, regional,\nmigration-focused strategy and initiative, (2) highlight the strengths and weaknesses of designing and\nimplementing an MLS of this type and scale, and (3) draw lessons on how to improve the\neffectiveness and efficiency of an MLS for future EU strategies and initiatives. Using a mixed-methods\n\n2\n  A finalized version of the report was submitted to DG NEAR on 22.10.2020 for layout and format review. This\nwill be reported in the next MENOA quarterly report.\n3\n  15 April was the cut-off date; however, some exceptions were made (following prior approval) for an April 30\ndeadline\n4\n  The report was submitted on 22.10.2020 as will be reported in the next quarterly report.\n                                                        5",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p5-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 6,
            "content": "Funded by the European Union\n\n\n\n\napproach, the ICMPD MENOA team developed several data collection tools, including a semi-\nstructured interview guide and online survey instrument to collect original data that will complement\na comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis of the key project documents and\nadministrative data. The team will triangulate the outputs of these analyses to develop key findings\nand likely, recommendations on the development, implementation and use of an MLS for the EU to\nsupport monitoring and learning as a key input to oversight, guidance and decision-making as well as\nfuture design of regional migration initiatives.\n\n\n 7.    Ongoing engagement and exchange with eMGPP team to develop sources for the EUTF NOA\n      specific and strategic objectives\n\nBoth cross-team members and ICMPD MENOA team members continued to provide extensive\nsupport to the eMGPP project. The original survey was finalised and translated through the support\nof the ICMPD MENOA team, who also participated in rigorous quality assurance of all related\noutputs. The team also continued research to enrich the third party data inventory as well as the\ndevelopment of the data identification missions with national actors in each of the target countries in\nNorth Africa. The first data identification mission with Tunisia, which will pilot the series of missions\nand take place remotely, is set to take place in early Q4 2020. The ICMPD MENOA team will co-lead\nthis activity along with the eMGPP colleagues.\n\n\n\n\nCHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS\n\n      COVID-19 specific measures: COVID-19 office restrictions related measures and changes\n      implemented during Q2 remained in place during Q3.\n\n      Reshuffling of revamped new COIs: The changes to COIs and introduction of the new COIs\n      raised a series of challenges. The initially agreed upon course of action, for the NOA window to\n      keep reporting on the same COIs for stability, had to be slightly corrected and balanced to allow\n      for the functioning of the reporting system at the EUTF level in the long term. To tackle the\n      challenge, the team reflected on the nature of the changes and the extent of the problem for\n      sustainability and presented a first comment to the methodological note on 14 September -see\n      section 4.\n\nOther challenges included:\n\n          Lack of final DOAs: [Challlenge] A recurrent issue facing the team has been the lack of\n          information on final, approved DOAs from IPs. [Mitigation solution] To tackle the challenge,\n          the team exchanged with DG NEAR on a heightened basis to clarify the status of relevant\n\n\n\n                                                   6",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p6-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 7,
            "content": "Funded by the European Union\n\n\n\n\n          areas, especially log frame alignment, data collection and AKVO entry. In that light,\n          cooperation with DG NEAR has been instrumental.\n\n          Lack of/or inconsistent reporting: [Challlenge] In several instances, and for diverse reasons,\n          IPs had difficulty, did not, or inconsistently reported qualitative and/or quantitative data for\n          NMR3. [Mitigation solution]\n          Reviewers ensured increased communication with IPs to clarify, identify, and receive\n          previously unreported data.\n\nMAIN ACTIVITIES FOR THE NEXT PROJECT QUARTER\n\nThe main activities planned for Q4 2020 include:\n     Further implementation of the COVID-19 indicators and other new COIs for existing and\n     forthcoming NOA projects, as applicable\n     Webpage development to support IPs, EUDs, and DG NEAR with the next phase of monitoring\n     and learning;\n     Continuation of collection and analysis of IP quantitative and qualitative monitoring data for the\n     fourth EUTF NOA Monitoring Report (NMR4);\n     Preparation of a EUTF NOA portfolio analysis, country, and regional level portraits for NMR4;\n     Log frame alignment and revisions for existing EUTF NOA IPs and contracts/projects;\n     Log frame alignment for new Action Fiches and contracts/projects in preparation for upcoming\n     operational committee meetings;\n     Updates to DG NEAR using the reporting tool (Contract Planning and Monitoring spreadsheet) to\n     provide an update on the status of each IP as needed;\n     Updates to data in AKVO and validation with IPs of published information;\n     Further coordination and planning with eMGPP on data sources, data collection and analysis\n     plans to assess progress related to the EUTF NOA specific and strategic objectives;\n     Ad hoc requests from DG NEAR for deliverables and from EUDs and IPs for technical assistance;\n     Finalization of Lessons Learned activities and a draft report integrating the interviews and survey\n     results.\n\n\n\n\n     Here under MENOA Updated Log Frame, reporting on the progress and achievement to date (in\n        green).\n\n\n\n\n                                                     7",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p7-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 8,
            "content": "Funded by the European Union\n\n\n\n\n                               8",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p8-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 9,
            "content": "",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p9-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 10,
            "content": "Results chain                   Indicators                Baseline                    Targets             Sources and means     Assumptions\n                                                                                                                      of verification\n                                                               (incl. reference year)     (incl. reference year)\n\n\nOverall objectives/ Impacts\n\nTo contribute to the setting up of a   % of EUTF NOA       0                            At least 80% of EUTF       EUTF Annual report\ncoherent, measurable and impact-       projects whose                                   NOA projects pursue        2018, 2019, and 2020\noriented cooperation framework         strategic                                        EUTF NOA strategic\nfor the EUTF                           objectives align                                 objectives (2020)          EUTF Programme\n                                       with those of the                                                           Evaluations\n                                       EUTF NOA                                         At least 80% of the        Suggestion: change\n                                                                                        EUTF NOA projects'         to as available/if\n                                       % of EUTF NOA                                    reporting output-          needed\n                                       projects                                         level data (2020)\n                                       reporting data at                                                           Audit report of the\n                                       the individual                                   To date, all contracts     European Court of\n                                                                                        have been aligned          Auditors\n                                       project output\n                                                                                        with EUTF NOA\n                                       and EUTF macro                                   objectives except for      MENOA database\n                                       output indicator\n                                       level                                            contracts, at DG           AKVO database\n\n\nSpecific objectives/ Outcomes",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p10-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 11,
            "content": "SpO1                                    % of EU             0   At least 80% of EU       Project\n                                                                                                                  EU TF strategic goals in\n                                        headquarters            staff report an          documentation            the EU TF strategic\nTo increase institutional knowledge     and EU                  increased knowledge      including data from      document demonstrate\nof EUTF NOA projects' initial results   delegation staff        of EUTF progress and     webinar follow up        internal coherence\n(progress on output level               with increased          promising strategies     survey and LL            (annual revision)\nindicators) and what shows              knowledge of            (to be assessed end      exercise as applicable   All EU TF NOA\npromise of effectiveness                EUTF NOA                of 2020)                                          approved projects are\n                                        results and                                                               shared with ICMPD for\n                                        promising                                                                 review and revision\n                                        strategies                                                                Willingness of IPs to\n                                                                                                                  revise and align LFs and\nSpO2                                    % of DG NEAR        0   At least 50% of DG       Interviews with          DOAs with EUTF NOA\n                                        staff involved in       NEAR staff involved in   stakeholders from        M&E framework\nTo enlarge internal knowledge of        EU TF NOA               EU TF NOA framework      DG NEAR including        Government partners\nhow to establish and support MLS        framework who           report benefits from     data from webinar        and security situation\nsystems for large regional and          report benefits         increased M&E            follow up survey and     allow for IPs to\nmulti-topical EU programmes such                                                                                  implement initiatives\n                                        from increased          activities and results   LL exercise as\nas the EUTF.                                                                                                      and collect data on\n                                        M&E activities          (to be assessed end      applicable               each one\n                                        and results             of 2020)\n                                                                                                                  There is no subordinate\n                                                                                                                  restructuring of M&E\n                                                                                                                  system for all EU\n                                                                                                                  initiatives\n                                                                                                                  M&E results are shared\n                                                                                                                  with key stakeholders\nComponent objectives/ Medium term outcomes",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p11-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 12,
            "content": "CO1.1                               All elements of     0   100% complete           Project                  Projects fulfil the M&E\n                                    an MLS                  (2018)                  documentation            requirements\nTo improve the monitoring and       designed and in\nevaluation of the initiatives       place\nimplemented under the EUTF\nNOA\n\n\n\n\nCO2.1                               Share of            0   At least 80% of         Project                  Stakeholders make use of\n                                    stakeholders in         stakeholders            documentation            their increased M&E\nTo increase the competencies of     the programme           perceive the increase   including data from      competencies\nEU headquarters, EU delegations     who report an           in competencies to      webinar follow up\nand implementing partners to        increase in             implement M&E           survey and LL\nimplement an MLS (operational)      competencies            system as \"high\" or     exercise as applicable\n                                    to use an M&E           \"very high\" (To be\n                                    system                  assessed end of\n                                                            2020)\n\nCO2.2                               Share of            0   At least 80% of\n                                    stakeholders in         stakeholders\nTo institutionalise the knowledge   the programme           perceive that the\nand experiences gained in the       who perceive            knowledge and\ncourse of the monitoring and        that the                experience gained\nevaluation of initiatives           knowledge and           have been\nimplemented lessons learned         experience              institutionalised (to\nat output level (level of           gained have             be assessed end of\nimplementation)                     been                    2020)\n                                    institutionalised",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p12-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 13,
            "content": "Results/ Short term outcomes\n\nResult 1.1.1                        % of initiatives    0   80% of initiatives        External EUTF NOA\n                                    under the EUTF          under the EUTF NOA        evaluations and/or\nInitiatives implemented under       NOA which are           are assessed by           data from webinar\nthe EUTF NOA are logically          assessed by             evaluators/auditors       follow up survey and\nconsistent and in line with the     evaluators/audi         as logically consistent   LL exercise as\nprogrammes' intervention logic      tors as logically       and in line with the      available and\n                                    consistent and          programmes'               applicable\n                                    in line with the        intervention logic\n                                    programmes'             (2020)                    Emails from EUD or\n                                    intervention                                      DG NEAR noting their\n                                    logic                   DG NEAR to share          acceptance of the\n                                                            any evaluations from      aligned log frame as\n                                                            IPs with ICMPD to be      logically consistent\n                                                            reviewed, analysed\n                                                            and included in\n                                                            NMR4 as available\n\nResult 1.1.2                        Availability of     0   1 (2018)                  Project\n                                    technical                                         documentation\nTechnical system for the            system for the\nprocessing of data and reporting    processing of\nin line with the MLS framework is   and reporting of\nin place                            data for\n                                    indicators as\n                                    defined by the\n                                    M&E\n                                    framework\n\nResult 1.1.3                        Stakeholders        0   80% of stakeholders       Project",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p13-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 14,
            "content": "Procedures for data collection     perception of           perceive procedures     documentation\nand reporting are defined and in   usefulness,             for data collection     including data from\nplace                              comprehensive           and reporting as very   webinar follow up\n                                   ness and                useful,                 survey and LL\n                                   accuracy of             comprehensive and       exercise as applicable\n                                   procedures for          accurate (2020)\n                                   data collection\n                                   and reporting\n\nResult 1.1.4                       - Availability of   0   Data submitted by       Data on COIs from\n                                   qualitative and         IPs in 2020             IPs as analysed for\nData for the defined indicators    qualitative data                                NMRs\nare collected, processed and       sets\nreported regularly\n\n                                   -Stakeholders'      0   - Stakeholders assess\n                                   perception              the usefulness of\n                                   (EUTF donors)           information provided\n                                   on usefulness of        in the annual\n                                   information             monitoring reports as\n                                   provided in the         \"very useful\" (2020)\n                                   annual\n                                   monitoring\n                                   reports\n\nResult 1.1.5                       Compliance of       0   All external            External evaluations\n                                   external                evaluations received    of the EUTF NOA as\nExternal evaluations are           evaluations with        to be analysed and      provided by DG NEAR\nconducted in line with             Programme\n                                                           included in NMR         to be analysed and\ninternational evaluation           Evaluation\n                                   Standards of the        reports, as available   included in NMR4 as\nstandards                                                                          available by country\n                                   Joint Committee\n                                   on Standards",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p14-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 15,
            "content": "for Educational                                   (distinct subsection\n                                    Evaluation:                                       NMRs for any\n                                    Utility,                                          country submitting\n                                    Feasibility,\n                                                                                      evaluation reports\n                                    Propriety and\n                                    Accuracy                                          for analysis and\n                                                                                      inclusion)\n\nResult 2.1.1                        Share of EU          0   80% of stakeholders      Project\n                                    headquarters,            perceive increase in     documentation,\nEU headquarters, EU delegations     EU delegations           knowledge and skills     including data from\nand project implementers have       and project              in the area of project   webinar follow up\nincreased knowledge and skills in   implementers             design, monitoring       survey and LL\nthe area of monitoring and          who report               and evaluation as        exercise as applicable\nlearning system                     increase in              \"very high\" (2020)\n                                    knowledge and\n                                    skills in the area\n                                    of project\n                                    design,\n                                    monitoring and\n                                    evaluation\n\nResult 2.2.1                        Stakeholders at      0   80% of stakeholders      Project\n                                    EU delegations           perceive accessibility   documentation,\nLessons learned and experiences     and/or EU                and usefulness of        including data from\ngained in the course of the MLS     headquarters             lessons learned and      webinar follow up\nof the initiatives implemented      perception of            experiences              survey and LL\nare systematised and accessible     accessibility and        systematised as \"very    exercise as applicable\nfor all stakeholders                usefulness of            good\" (2020)\n                                    lessons learned\n                                    and experiences",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p15-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 16,
            "content": "systematised\n\nOutputs related to Result 1.1.1 Initiatives implemented under the EUTF NOA are logically consistent and in line with the programmes'\nintervention logic\n\nOutput 1.1.1.1                    Support NOA\n                                                                                                                      Outputs are accessible\n                                  IPs to include                                                                      for all stakeholders\nAligning NOA MLS framework        and report on 1-\nwith the structure of the EUTF                                                                                        Outputs and support\n                                  3 of the 41 COIs                                                                    services are used by\nSahel and HoA windows\n                                                                                                                      stakeholders\nOutput 1.1.1.2                    Availability of    0                 1 (2018)              Project\n                                  updated                              1 (2019)              documentation\nUpdated version of the Result     versions of the\nMatrix                            Result Matrix\n\nOutput 1.1.1.3                    Availability of    0                 1 (2018)              Project\n                                  French                               1 (2019)              documentation\nFrench translation of the         translation\nupdated versions of the Result\nMatrix\n\nOutput 1.1.1.4                    Availability of    0                 1 (2018)              Project\n                                  check lists                                                documentation\nCheck lists for IPs and EU DEL\n\nOutput 1.1.1.5                    Availability of    0                 1 (2018)              Project\n                                  'logframer'                                                documentation\nExcel tool for the alignment of\nlog frames ('logframer')\n\nOutput 1.1.1.6                    Availability of    0                 1 (2018)              Project\n                                  internal",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p16-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 17,
            "content": "Internal guidelines for the review   guidelines                                     documentation\nand alignment of project log\nframes\n\nOutput 1.1.1.7                       % of EUTF NOA     0   50% of all action        Project\n                                     action fiches,        fiches, 70% of all       documentation\nAction fiches, DoAs and              DoAs and              DoAs and 90% of all\nlogframes reviewed, commented        project log           project log frames\nand aligned with the MLS             frames                (2020)\nframework                            reviewed,\n                                     commented and         To date, all AF, DOAs,\n                                     aligned               and LF have been\n                                                           aligned; IOM and\n                                                           MdM LFs have not\n                                                           been aligned per DG\n\n\nOutput 1.1.1.8                       Share of          0   100% of all projects     Project\n                                     projects              the DoAs or log          documentation\nSkype/ WebEx or telephone            receiving             frames of which were\nconferences to discuss the           support via           reviewed received\nsuggestions for alignment and        Skype or              support (2020)\nindicators                           telephone\n                                                           To date, all IPs\n                                                           requesting alignment\n                                                           have received\n                                                           technical support\n\nOutput 1.1.1.9                       Share of IPs      0   80% of the lead          Project\n                                     (lead partners)       partners were met at     documentation\nIn-person meetings with IPs to       met in-person         least once in-person\ndiscuss the suggestions for          to discuss",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p17-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 18,
            "content": "alignment and indicators         project                                (2020)\n                                 alignment and\n                                 indicators                             To be assessed end\n                                                                        of 2020 (and\n                                                                        mitigated by COVID-\n                                                                        19)\n\nOutput 1.1.1.10                  Availability of   0                    1 (2018)               Project\n                                 up-dated                               1 (2019)               documentation\nUpdated guidelines for IPs       guidelines                             1 (2020)\n\nOutput 1.1.1.11                  Availability of   0                    1 (2018)               Project\n                                 French versions                        1 (2019)               documentation\nFrench versions of up-dated      of up-dated                            1 (2020)\nguidelines                       guidelines\n\nOutputs related to Result 1.1.2 Technical system for the processing of data and reporting in line with the MLS framework is in place\n\nOutput 1.1.2.1                   Availability of                        1 (2018)               Project\n                                                                                                                        Outputs are accessible\n                                 database                                                      documentation            for all stakeholders\nDatabase for quantitative\n                                                                                                                        Outputs and support\nmonitoring data set up                                                                                                  services are used by\n                                                                                                                        stakeholders\nOutput 1.1.2.2                   Availability of                        1 (2018)               Project\n                                 database                                                      documentation\nDatabase for qualitative\nmonitoring data set up\n\nOutputs related to Result 1.1.3 Procedures for data collection and reporting are defined and in place\n\nOutput 1.1.3.1                   Availability of   0                    1 (2018)               Project\n                                                                                                                        Outputs are accessible\n                                 templates                                                     documentation            for all stakeholders\nTemplate for IPs for the",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p18-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 19,
            "content": "reporting of data on outputs and                                                                                        Outputs and support\nIOs (customised data collection                                                                                         services are used by\ntool or DCT)                                                                                                            stakeholders\n\nOutput 1.1.3.2                       Availability of     0               1 (2018)              Project\n                                     Guidelines                                                documentation\nGuidelines for template for IPs\nfor the reporting of data on\noutputs and IOs (instructions\nincluded in the customised data\ncollection tool or DCT)\n\nOutput 1.1.3.3                       Availability of     0               At least 4 (2018)     Project\n                                     tools for data                                            documentation\nExamples of tools for data           collections                                               including sample\ncollection                                                                                     survey tools\n\nOutputs related to Result 1.1.4 Data for the defined indicators are collected, processed and reported regularly\n\nOutput 1.1.4.1                       Availability of a   0               1 (2018)              Project\n                                                                                                                        Outputs are accessible\n                                     roster for                                                documentation            for all stakeholders\nRoster of relevant data              relevant data\ncollections as reference point for   collections                                               NOTE: We completed       Outputs and support\nstrategic and context indicators                                                               several rounds of this   services are used by\n                                                                                               and then handed          stakeholders\n                                                                                               over to eMGPP to\n                                                                                               continue work on\n                                                                                               this\n\nOutput 1.1.4.2                       Availability of     0               1 (2018)              Project\n                                     list of survey                                            documentation\nList of questions to be included",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p19-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 20,
            "content": "into the MEDHIMS surveys           questions\n\nOutput 1.1.4.3                     No. of countries    0   At least 3 countries   Project\n                                   visited                 visited by end of      documentation\nOrganisation of data                                       2018\nidentification missions in the     No. of                                         NOTE: We developed\ntarget countries of the NOA        stakeholders            At least 7             the concept for this\n                                   interviewed per         stakeholders           and identified\n                                   country                 interviewed per        agencies to meet and\n                                                           country                then handed over to\n                                                                                  eMGPP to complete\n\nOutput 1.1.4.4                     Share of IPs        0   80% of the lead        Project\n                                   (lead partners)         partners were met at   documentation\nIn-person support to IPs on data   met in-person           least once in-person\ncollection and reporting           to support them         (2020) (due to\n                                   with data               COVID-19, mtgs took\n                                   collection and          place via\n                                   reporting               video/zoom)\n\nOutput 1.1.4..5                    Share of            0   For 50% of the         Project\n                                   projects with a         projects a set of      documentation\nData set (quantitative data) for   set of                  quantitative data is\neach NOA project                   quantitative            available (2020)\n                                   data\n                                                           On average, for at\n                                   Share of output         least 50% of the\n                                   and IO                  output and IO\n                                   indicators listed       indicators listed in\n                                   in the projects         the projects log\n                                   log frame for           frame data are\n                                   which data are",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p20-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 21,
            "content": "available (per                     available (2020)\n                                    project)\n\nOutput 1.1.4.6                      Share of           0               For 70% of the        Project\n                                    projects with a                    projects a set of     documentation\nData set (qualitative data) for     set of                             qualitative data is\neach NOA project                    qualitative data                   available (2020)\n\nOutput 1.1.4.7                      Share of                           For 70% of the        Project\n                                    projects for                       projects data are     documentation\nData set in AKVO (section 1, 4      which                              available (2020)\nand 5) for each NOA project         obligatory data\n                                    in section 1,4\n                                    and 5 of the\n                                    AKVO database\n                                    is available\n\nOutput 1.1.4.8                      Availability of    0               1 (2019)              Project\n                                                                                                                     Outputs are accessible\n                                    yearly                             1 (2020)              documentation           for all stakeholders\nAnalytic reports (regional level)   monitoring                                                                       Outputs and support\n                                    report at                                                                        services are used by\n                                    regional level                                                                   stakeholders\n\nOutput 1.1.4.9                      Availability of    0               1 (2019)              Project\n                                    yearly                             1 (2020)              documentation\nAnalytic reports (national level)   monitoring\n                                    report at\n                                    national level\n\nOutputs related to Result 2.1.1 EU headquarters, EU delegations and project implementers have increased knowledge and skills in the area of\nproject design, monitoring and evaluation",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p21-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 22,
            "content": "Output 2.1.1.1                     Availability of a   0   1 (2018)               Project\n                                                                                                         Outputs are accessible\n                                   Theory of                                      documentation          for all stakeholders\nEUTF cross-window Theory of        change                                                                Outputs and support\nChange                                                                                                   services are used by\nOutput 2.1.1.2                     Availability of     0   1 (2018)               Project                stakeholders\n                                   written                                        documentation\nWritten review of revised Theory   comments\nof Change\nOutput 2.1.1.3                     Number of           0   At least 2 per year    Project\n                                   coordination                                   documentation\nCoordination meetings with         meetings                                       regarding 2018-2020\nother EU TF windows                                                               coordination with DG\n                                                                                  DEVCO and Altai on\n                                                                                  COIs, EUTF TOC, COI\n                                                                                  definitions, new\n                                                                                  COVID-19 indicators\n\nOutput 2.1.1.4                     Availability of     0   1 (2018)               Project\n                                   joint macro                                    documentation\nSet of joint EUTF macro output     output\nindicators                         indicators\n\nOutput 2.1.1.5                     Number of           0   At least one monthly   Project\n                                   phone meetings          meeting                documentation in the\nRegularly scheduled and Ad hoc     with DG NEAR                                   form of calendared\nphone mtgs with DG NEAR                                                           meetings and appts\n\nOutput 2.1.1.6                     Number of in-       0   At least 4 per year    In-person mtgs\n                                   person mtgs\nAd-hoc in-person mtgs with DG      with DG NEAR                                   2018.\nNEAR\n                                                                                  (1) June 2018. Mtg",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p22-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 23,
            "content": "with DEVCO, DG\nNEAR, Altai on ext.\neval. plan & design\n\n(2) July 2018. Mtg\nwith Altai for TOC\ndevelopment + DG\nNEAR on project\nupdates\n\n(3) Nov. 2018\nMENOA update mtg\n(database, AKVO,\nDCT, trainings, etc.)\n\n2019.\n\n(1) Feb. 2019 PSC and\neMGPP kick-off\n\n(2) June 2019. EUTF\nBoard Presentation\n\n(3) July 2019. EUTF\nNOA OpCom Present.\n\n(4) Oct 2019. DEVCO\ntech. mtg + new PO.\n\n(5) Nov 2019. PSC +\nmtg with ROM lead\n\n(6) Dec 2019. EUTF",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p23-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 24,
            "content": "NOA OpCom Present.\n\n                                                                                             2020: video\n                                                                                             conferences\n                                                                                             following COVID-19\n                                                                                             restrictions\n\nOutput 2.1.1.7                    Number of staff     0               At least one staff     Project\n                                  of EU DEL in                        member of each EU      documentation\nIn-person introduction to NOA     target countries                    DEL (2018); Sept.\nMLS framework, data collection    of the NOA who                      2017 workshop, staff\nand reporting for EU DEL          received in-                        from all EUDs were\n                                  person                              present, including\n                                  introduction                        Algeria\n\n                                  Availability of     0               1 (2019)               Project\nOutput 2.1.1.8\n                                  concept for                                                documentation\nConcept for regional events on    regional event\nMLS                               on M&E\n\nOutput 2.1.1.9                    Electronic or       0               TBD                    Project\n                                  web-based                                                  documentation\nMLS Sustainability resources on   resources on\nAKVO and other key MLS            AKVO and other\ncomponents                        key the EUTF\n                                  NOA MLS\n\nOutputs related to Result 2.2.1 Lessons learned and experiences gained in the course of the MLS of the initiatives implemented are\nsystematised and accessible for all stakeholders\n\nOutput 2.2.1.1                    - Availability of   0               1 (2020)               Project\n                                                                                                                    Outputs are accessible",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p24-{size}.png"
        },
        {
            "document": "https://fragdenstaat.de/api/v1/document/238033/",
            "number": 25,
            "content": "Website with FAQs and          website                          documentation   for all stakeholders\ndocuments related to the NOA                                                    Outputs and support\nMLS framework                                                                   services are used by\n                                                                                stakeholders\nOutput 2.2.1.2                 Availability of   0   1 (2020)   Project\n                               report on                        documentation\nReport on lessons learned      lessons learned",
            "width": 2480,
            "height": 3508,
            "image": "https://media.frag-den-staat.de/files/docs/31/82/f2/3182f2363fe546a79d5c846387785874/page-p25-{size}.png"
        }
    ]
}