“ & ö page 085:

 

Sant Monday PETE EETER
Sent. Monday, August ö2, 2 94 5:22 PM = .: Eiassirzet 2
To:. NSDJ(FBN)  ° | 3 Helena
Supect RE: GTMO a - ESTERETTIE

 

 

“ Beciaasersen! Fan

SENSITIVE. BUT UNGLASSIHIEN,

NON-RECORD a BEUTHIFORETREN TEE N
Bs -ı 2.000 HEREINEISTÜNCLASSTFIENIEXCEPT

DJ En "EEE DE NHERE: du

‚Iaras at Srme 12/02/2002- „91/18/2003 and ig nat nersonaliy Ubserve any mistrestmen ef
“ datainges, Iwoullhe very surgrised Hanytking: sitnilaris Ab Shraik srcareiat Camp Beika prior Io
‚or dering my TDY at aTınd. 1 air ua nst hekieve that auy abasive ach wöuld have gccurreni 1 ine -
. preseate & hureau PEFSSANEN. .

Zu
pi
ZH
atinfnmaon was urovidad snecincaliy In my FR-302 dated ng 4
g AUT an it was nat ällegeii that hl nersonnel were: - 27c -4
alegetions regarding harshı treatment are Ineludenl in the last paragrapı ithefg- 272 -1
= allaged Weatmeht is not nearly 38 aggressiie as ihetechninues allegedtohausheen :°”
"used at Ahn Chraib, hin] ____Is allegations are the only allegations of nhysical mistreatment wRieh - -- .
-  Kaeeame aware ei while at&TMO. Akdftanal Iniermation may he abtained rom Lanımane Sneeialist ‚a
08 e aaly Üighur transiater.daring my TRY. As ha only Bighor transietgr,is[ had... »s_-1
22. regmlartentact wir allofihe auproximateiy tray Bighurdenaiuees. 15 „Net empiosment at &Tni0 Bien
. in Jannary 012003. en en . FF

 
   

Te Nahers: are moderate Akislins whe- ancepin East Turkestan, which wäs taken aver. by ine Ehinese ”
andrenamedihe Kinilang province-of-China. The dighurs wereoiterediandin Afghanistan in orlerte
e-. men annasing Chinese apnressien. They were often insniren iy Banlio free Asia, wkich 5
bc -1 s farmerty a broadeaster for. The Nighurs gonsidered thenıselves to 25 Anhting for r
... demoeraty, and they idelizedihe United States. Altiougk the ighurs are- Masiim their ayenda id not.
appear io ürciade Isismie radicaiisen. They claimed is häve no neliticak connection te isiamie
" wrrirists or ihte Taliban. However, heir can in Afghanistan. was homked, and theyfied 19 Pakistan.
 - Tas Lighers were cantared by ihe Pakistanis, with halfneing tranferradto us custody.andhalikeing .
- Temandes direcäy te Ghinese afficiats, I was allegen that Ihe Uighurs who were iransferreii-diresttyto
. the Shinese were immediately Neguten. Äl the tima ei my TRY, US Affieials were censidering whether ..
 Ipregura Ihe-Yigkurs te the Chinesa, nossihly te yaln support for antieipated US action in che Mid ia
‚tast. The Lighur detainees at &TMa were. sonvincel inat ey would te immediately eneented if mey,

Were retumeil ta China. . en
is). ”
(8)

annnna

: RESPONSES-239

Page 20f5.

 
     

(6) Information in the naragranı atthe 1oi oipage 21 ka ats has nothing ng io with: Be aBuse at” ® Fe
STH: but helps Kutike Uighars situation in persnöcäive. . ee BD -1
 bTE -1

: ne! Alehar st sry is iaschnatiun, audis Ihe only hing Iwas ausfe dfthat has 10 ds with hrs Weatment

 

There Was a camın at GTmo that was eismantied prier tomy TIV, and; I beilevs, prierio Ihe. constrnction
. ‚gißamp Date. Ipelieye ii was called Garmin X-Ray. IHany alase occurred at GIG, RR welt mostiihel) -
have oscurren Ihere, and most Inely Eid Bol imvolve bureak personnel, - on

" That's Sal itan ormide on this suhjeet, Attacheni isacapy u BIyEG Inticating that l.did not persons.
. "abserve angressive trealment ot GTMD detainees, Also altachenl are maß regarding my ne
interviews aftwo Dighm | a
Zu on bTE-L.

BC - a Jasn Den, Far or AA oleatrimes sad e Au

b7e 2,

 

. -öngina Message: u
. * Fram; MCCRAW, STEVENC., (inSD) en: a .
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2094 1:42 PM °
Ta  ____\mm)(reh a (min) gran) ——y co) em
u [OIO) (CON;L —  —  ——  __ _ J{MMLIEBD: .
NYtre DD ——  Immtend_____ |] — En: Pal
Kmo)ee]_20— _ CHSIEBN; BarttE, FRANKIE CTD) (FRI);
LI HO) (FEN);

Fs[| _— —_ _TeA)ter [000]
- — KL — ON) Ye Jam.
. EB MooeEan 00 MamceBi;f 0 PROScrBH;
I RED: BEE Were — — — — —_ _ JBBBN:
- Jr) oa core] _ Mesa 7
b6 -1 | fmwerdl Ram RROTTEn: .
"bD7C -1 RER; man 19 OHAH 1°
0.0 ep Ttetogcesn———  \taspiea) LO 5 —  — ]emoy -
EB ren (OXE: ne —— MM) (RB, |  —— — ——_ Fermo)
7 Kasoy FBHl amd) (FB;
EEE

. per Eitrend________ JRrTosh) KorFan):
. es ea CUMMINGS, ARTHUR: M. „eiD Fe u (FEN;
UI KMM}CEBI; —— Elli Kam) a

I men] —  —_  TsaeanL I JNv) trRI,;
(SF OL ee {FEB

u co)(ren | ____  ]
IR)EFBD; | _  — _ __ KARteBH | ———— — TeMo
£PX 0 U H0} {F r
4 cTD) a (TP) (FED]____ De) (Fan);

 

Fe

CTD I Moe 0 1.°
u (CO) (Fan) I (KRFTFEI) Bun IA PN I Peyet \..

RESPONSES-2H0

 

 

Br "var2oo

Response C

9 ©

Re.013l2
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .
Freeedence: ROUTINE Date: 077/14/200£
To: Counterterrorism Attn: MDLU

( ’ be -ı1

- From: Counterterrorism Divsion

FA/RDTU

Approved By: Bald Gary M N
Harrington T J

Battle Frankie b2 -1

bs -1 . -
bIc -1

peasind a: DR pie
Case ID #: 297-H0-1327669-A  (Fending)

Title: COUNTERTERRORISM DIVISION
GIMO, INSPECTION SPECIAL INQUIRY

Synopsis: To advise of observations of treatment during
tenure at GTMO. - :

Details: Speciäl Agent[_ _ ___ — "was assigned TDY

to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (GTMO from 1 March 2004 through 27 B6 1
April 2004. While there SA witnessed interviews pre 1
which could be characterized as adversarial in nature.

However, SA did not observe any aggressive treatment

or the use of Interview/interrogation techniques that were
inconsistent with Bureau interview policy/guidelines.

“ _

b6 -ı
S:ı\CTD\Fly ream| —  Ähstmo.sc.upe b7e -1

RESPONSES-241

ResponseD

Message ZZ . ) . “ u “ 8 i 5 Page 10f4 |

I 0 Janspy ran

b6 -1 . .
Ce: (IR) (FBI}

| _ Sublect RE: GTMO

 

Since you did not personally observe any mistreatment, we will classify this as a negative response. Thanks.

From: (IR) (FB)

ps -ı Sentı Tuesday, July 13, 2004 9:20 AM
. RED -

| Subject: RE: GTMÖ

SENSITIVE BUT UNGLASSIEIED
NON-RECORD- Zu

b6& -1 .
er I M
[ was assigned-to GTMO from July 17,.2003 - August 7, 2003. !'m a member of CIRG's Behavioral

“needed. During my tenure there, | never personally witnessed agressive treatment, interragations or
interview techniques on GTMO detainees. | did hear löud music being played and people yelling !oudiy
#om bahind closed doors of interview rooms but | could not say they were yalling at detäinees. | also
observed ströbe lights in interview raoms on a number of occasions but never observed those being used
on detainees. . \ Be - ln '

There were marıy &omments made by investigators during my tenure at GTMO that every time the FBl
 estsbiished a rapport with a detaines, the military would step in and the detainee would stop being
cooperative. There were also accusations that the Military would present themselves as FBI Agentsto
detainees.and harrass them but that was never persönally observed by ma.

\ If you have any questions, pleassconaeimidfUD |: _— 2-4
a nn
brc -1 ° CIRGTNCAVE nn . -
. ©  FBlAcademy ee : . on rc.
Quantico, Virginia 22135 ° u \ ” RESPONSES 242

Original Message —- .
From: MCCRAW, STEVEN C. (INSD) (FEI} .

     
   

Sent; Monday; July 12, 2004 12:13 P _
I Imm) (ren:
oroytcony[ {MM} (FBR);
be -ı { )
bIc -1 I TesirenL___ Toy cear;]  Teon)
. « Au

7113/2004

 

Analysis Unit and our function was io observe interviews of detainees and provide interview strategies a5 “

o

.b6 -1

b7cC -1'

 

To: Inspection Attn:

From:. CIRG.

 

(Rev. 01-31-2003) © on X

_ FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .

Preoedence: ROUTINE
b6 -1
b’C -1

 

"NCRVC, BAU - 3 EEE
Gomtactı sa [| 1

Approved By: Tidweil I Stephen ul” SR
Fedarcyk Janice .

Drafted Ey:

 

Case ID #: 297-HQ-A1327669-A (Pending); 30 4

- Title: COUNTERTERRORISM DIVISION,

GTMO,
INSPECTION SPECTAL INOUIRY
Synopsis: sah did not personally witness any »6 -1

. a : . . 70 -
aggressive treatment, ınterrogations or interview techniques on Dre 1
STMO detainess.

Administrative: Reference electronic mailings of AD Steven C.
MeCiraw, Inspeetion Division, July 9 and 12, 2004. :

Details: scal _—__ _ ] Critical Incident Response Group 56 -1
(CIRG), Behavioral Analysis Unit 3 (BAU-3) was deployed to emo PC 1
from July 17, 2003 - August 7, 2003. Members of the BAU Units

were regularly deployed to GIMO to observe interviews of _
detainees and provide interview strategies and other behavioral
assistance as needed. During my tenure at GTMO, I never

perscnally witnessed any aggressive treatment, interrogations or
interview techniques on GTMO detainees.

On several occasions, I did hear loud music being

played and people yelling loudly from behind closed doors of

intervjew rooms but I could not say that detainees were present
in those rooms. I also observed strobe lights in interview. rooms
on several occasions but never observed those being used on

 detainees.

There were many comments made by investigators during
my tenure at GTMO that every times the FBI established a rapport
with ä detaines, the military would step in and the detainee
would stop being cooperative. The military did not stop the
interviews while they were in progress but routinely took sontxel

ugloode)
alt

RESPONSES-243

G

20: Inspection From: CIE
Re: 597-H9-A1327669-A, 07/13/2094

of the detaine® when the interview was completed. The next time \ |
that detainee was interviewed, his level of cooperation was
dAiminished. There were also accusations made by different.

investigators that Military interrogatorf would present ..
themselves as FBI Agents to detainee dA harass them but chat B6 1

wag never personally observed by SSA . pIe 1

©" RESPONSES-244

To: Inspection FEom: cIRG
Re: ' 297-HQ-A1327669-A, 07/13/2004

LEAD (8):
Set Lead 1: (Info)
AT _WASHINSTON, DC

Read and clear.

+

RESPONSES-245

Response E