MENOA Progress Report_Q3.2020.docx-_Redacted
SpO1 % of EU 0 At least 80% of EU Project
EU TF strategic goals in
headquarters staff report an documentation the EU TF strategic
To increase institutional knowledge and EU increased knowledge including data from document demonstrate
of EUTF NOA projects' initial results delegation staff of EUTF progress and webinar follow up internal coherence
(progress on output level with increased promising strategies survey and LL (annual revision)
indicators) and what shows knowledge of (to be assessed end exercise as applicable All EU TF NOA
promise of effectiveness EUTF NOA of 2020) approved projects are
results and shared with ICMPD for
promising review and revision
strategies Willingness of IPs to
revise and align LFs and
SpO2 % of DG NEAR 0 At least 50% of DG Interviews with DOAs with EUTF NOA
staff involved in NEAR staff involved in stakeholders from M&E framework
To enlarge internal knowledge of EU TF NOA EU TF NOA framework DG NEAR including Government partners
how to establish and support MLS framework who report benefits from data from webinar and security situation
systems for large regional and report benefits increased M&E follow up survey and allow for IPs to
multi-topical EU programmes such implement initiatives
from increased activities and results LL exercise as
as the EUTF. and collect data on
M&E activities (to be assessed end applicable each one
and results of 2020)
There is no subordinate
restructuring of M&E
system for all EU
initiatives
M&E results are shared
with key stakeholders
Component objectives/ Medium term outcomes
CO1.1 All elements of 0 100% complete Project Projects fulfil the M&E
an MLS (2018) documentation requirements
To improve the monitoring and designed and in
evaluation of the initiatives place
implemented under the EUTF
NOA
CO2.1 Share of 0 At least 80% of Project Stakeholders make use of
stakeholders in stakeholders documentation their increased M&E
To increase the competencies of the programme perceive the increase including data from competencies
EU headquarters, EU delegations who report an in competencies to webinar follow up
and implementing partners to increase in implement M&E survey and LL
implement an MLS (operational) competencies system as "high" or exercise as applicable
to use an M&E "very high" (To be
system assessed end of
2020)
CO2.2 Share of 0 At least 80% of
stakeholders in stakeholders
To institutionalise the knowledge the programme perceive that the
and experiences gained in the who perceive knowledge and
course of the monitoring and that the experience gained
evaluation of initiatives knowledge and have been
implemented lessons learned experience institutionalised (to
at output level (level of gained have be assessed end of
implementation) been 2020)
institutionalised
Results/ Short term outcomes
Result 1.1.1 % of initiatives 0 80% of initiatives External EUTF NOA
under the EUTF under the EUTF NOA evaluations and/or
Initiatives implemented under NOA which are are assessed by data from webinar
the EUTF NOA are logically assessed by evaluators/auditors follow up survey and
consistent and in line with the evaluators/audi as logically consistent LL exercise as
programmes' intervention logic tors as logically and in line with the available and
consistent and programmes' applicable
in line with the intervention logic
programmes' (2020) Emails from EUD or
intervention DG NEAR noting their
logic DG NEAR to share acceptance of the
any evaluations from aligned log frame as
IPs with ICMPD to be logically consistent
reviewed, analysed
and included in
NMR4 as available
Result 1.1.2 Availability of 0 1 (2018) Project
technical documentation
Technical system for the system for the
processing of data and reporting processing of
in line with the MLS framework is and reporting of
in place data for
indicators as
defined by the
M&E
framework
Result 1.1.3 Stakeholders 0 80% of stakeholders Project
Procedures for data collection perception of perceive procedures documentation
and reporting are defined and in usefulness, for data collection including data from
place comprehensive and reporting as very webinar follow up
ness and useful, survey and LL
accuracy of comprehensive and exercise as applicable
procedures for accurate (2020)
data collection
and reporting
Result 1.1.4 - Availability of 0 Data submitted by Data on COIs from
qualitative and IPs in 2020 IPs as analysed for
Data for the defined indicators qualitative data NMRs
are collected, processed and sets
reported regularly
-Stakeholders' 0 - Stakeholders assess
perception the usefulness of
(EUTF donors) information provided
on usefulness of in the annual
information monitoring reports as
provided in the "very useful" (2020)
annual
monitoring
reports
Result 1.1.5 Compliance of 0 All external External evaluations
external evaluations received of the EUTF NOA as
External evaluations are evaluations with to be analysed and provided by DG NEAR
conducted in line with Programme
included in NMR to be analysed and
international evaluation Evaluation
Standards of the reports, as available included in NMR4 as
standards available by country
Joint Committee
on Standards
for Educational (distinct subsection
Evaluation: NMRs for any
Utility, country submitting
Feasibility,
evaluation reports
Propriety and
Accuracy for analysis and
inclusion)
Result 2.1.1 Share of EU 0 80% of stakeholders Project
headquarters, perceive increase in documentation,
EU headquarters, EU delegations EU delegations knowledge and skills including data from
and project implementers have and project in the area of project webinar follow up
increased knowledge and skills in implementers design, monitoring survey and LL
the area of monitoring and who report and evaluation as exercise as applicable
learning system increase in "very high" (2020)
knowledge and
skills in the area
of project
design,
monitoring and
evaluation
Result 2.2.1 Stakeholders at 0 80% of stakeholders Project
EU delegations perceive accessibility documentation,
Lessons learned and experiences and/or EU and usefulness of including data from
gained in the course of the MLS headquarters lessons learned and webinar follow up
of the initiatives implemented perception of experiences survey and LL
are systematised and accessible accessibility and systematised as "very exercise as applicable
for all stakeholders usefulness of good" (2020)
lessons learned
and experiences
systematised
Outputs related to Result 1.1.1 Initiatives implemented under the EUTF NOA are logically consistent and in line with the programmes'
intervention logic
Output 1.1.1.1 Support NOA
Outputs are accessible
IPs to include for all stakeholders
Aligning NOA MLS framework and report on 1-
with the structure of the EUTF Outputs and support
3 of the 41 COIs services are used by
Sahel and HoA windows
stakeholders
Output 1.1.1.2 Availability of 0 1 (2018) Project
updated 1 (2019) documentation
Updated version of the Result versions of the
Matrix Result Matrix
Output 1.1.1.3 Availability of 0 1 (2018) Project
French 1 (2019) documentation
French translation of the translation
updated versions of the Result
Matrix
Output 1.1.1.4 Availability of 0 1 (2018) Project
check lists documentation
Check lists for IPs and EU DEL
Output 1.1.1.5 Availability of 0 1 (2018) Project
'logframer' documentation
Excel tool for the alignment of
log frames ('logframer')
Output 1.1.1.6 Availability of 0 1 (2018) Project
internal
Internal guidelines for the review guidelines documentation
and alignment of project log
frames
Output 1.1.1.7 % of EUTF NOA 0 50% of all action Project
action fiches, fiches, 70% of all documentation
Action fiches, DoAs and DoAs and DoAs and 90% of all
logframes reviewed, commented project log project log frames
and aligned with the MLS frames (2020)
framework reviewed,
commented and To date, all AF, DOAs,
aligned and LF have been
aligned; IOM and
MdM LFs have not
been aligned per DG
Output 1.1.1.8 Share of 0 100% of all projects Project
projects the DoAs or log documentation
Skype/ WebEx or telephone receiving frames of which were
conferences to discuss the support via reviewed received
suggestions for alignment and Skype or support (2020)
indicators telephone
To date, all IPs
requesting alignment
have received
technical support
Output 1.1.1.9 Share of IPs 0 80% of the lead Project
(lead partners) partners were met at documentation
In-person meetings with IPs to met in-person least once in-person
discuss the suggestions for to discuss
alignment and indicators project (2020)
alignment and
indicators To be assessed end
of 2020 (and
mitigated by COVID-
19)
Output 1.1.1.10 Availability of 0 1 (2018) Project
up-dated 1 (2019) documentation
Updated guidelines for IPs guidelines 1 (2020)
Output 1.1.1.11 Availability of 0 1 (2018) Project
French versions 1 (2019) documentation
French versions of up-dated of up-dated 1 (2020)
guidelines guidelines
Outputs related to Result 1.1.2 Technical system for the processing of data and reporting in line with the MLS framework is in place
Output 1.1.2.1 Availability of 1 (2018) Project
Outputs are accessible
database documentation for all stakeholders
Database for quantitative
Outputs and support
monitoring data set up services are used by
stakeholders
Output 1.1.2.2 Availability of 1 (2018) Project
database documentation
Database for qualitative
monitoring data set up
Outputs related to Result 1.1.3 Procedures for data collection and reporting are defined and in place
Output 1.1.3.1 Availability of 0 1 (2018) Project
Outputs are accessible
templates documentation for all stakeholders
Template for IPs for the
reporting of data on outputs and Outputs and support
IOs (customised data collection services are used by
tool or DCT) stakeholders
Output 1.1.3.2 Availability of 0 1 (2018) Project
Guidelines documentation
Guidelines for template for IPs
for the reporting of data on
outputs and IOs (instructions
included in the customised data
collection tool or DCT)
Output 1.1.3.3 Availability of 0 At least 4 (2018) Project
tools for data documentation
Examples of tools for data collections including sample
collection survey tools
Outputs related to Result 1.1.4 Data for the defined indicators are collected, processed and reported regularly
Output 1.1.4.1 Availability of a 0 1 (2018) Project
Outputs are accessible
roster for documentation for all stakeholders
Roster of relevant data relevant data
collections as reference point for collections NOTE: We completed Outputs and support
strategic and context indicators several rounds of this services are used by
and then handed stakeholders
over to eMGPP to
continue work on
this
Output 1.1.4.2 Availability of 0 1 (2018) Project
list of survey documentation
List of questions to be included
into the MEDHIMS surveys questions
Output 1.1.4.3 No. of countries 0 At least 3 countries Project
visited visited by end of documentation
Organisation of data 2018
identification missions in the No. of NOTE: We developed
target countries of the NOA stakeholders At least 7 the concept for this
interviewed per stakeholders and identified
country interviewed per agencies to meet and
country then handed over to
eMGPP to complete
Output 1.1.4.4 Share of IPs 0 80% of the lead Project
(lead partners) partners were met at documentation
In-person support to IPs on data met in-person least once in-person
collection and reporting to support them (2020) (due to
with data COVID-19, mtgs took
collection and place via
reporting video/zoom)
Output 1.1.4..5 Share of 0 For 50% of the Project
projects with a projects a set of documentation
Data set (quantitative data) for set of quantitative data is
each NOA project quantitative available (2020)
data
On average, for at
Share of output least 50% of the
and IO output and IO
indicators listed indicators listed in
in the projects the projects log
log frame for frame data are
which data are
