2ndplenarypresentation4

Dieses Dokument ist Teil der Anfrage „Meetings of the HLEG on access to data for effective law enforcement

/ 47
PDF herunterladen
Ref. Ares(2024)225955 - 12/01/2024
1

Data retention : a complicated story

 

U 2006: 1° Belgian law on data retention

Ü

2015 : Law annulled by the Belgian Constitutional Court

Ü

2016 : New law on data retention with restriction on

the acces to the data for the law enforcement
2019 : New appeal for annulment against Data Retention
06/10/2020 : Ruling of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) (Quadrature du net)

22/04/2021: Belgian Constitutional Court made a “Copy-paste” of the decision CEJ

vo DU.)

oO

Federal Police
2

Despite this long « Story »!

Some authorities doubt whether

data retention is really still needed
OR Nele ET A
3

Arguments for maintaining a

minimal data Retention in
Belgium
4

The figures -— Amount of

data needed
5

Some figures

 

Comments

IP - 3G - 4G LTE/WiMax -
Technologies IMS - Volte
VoWifi et 5G
Evidence
No Sky-ECC without data
Centralized wired tapping 10.744 retention

 

 

oO

Federal Police
6

DATA RETENTION

\
= Fuel for Justice I
and Police work

 

NO investigation Falh
against organised N)

crıme without D.R.
e.g. sky ECC
7

And without Data

retention
8

Perverse effects in criminal investigation?

 

What if data retention disappears?

Loss of efficiency (much more means, more time, ...) to achieve
(or not) a result
9

Perverse effects?

Mandatory use of more intrusive alternatives :
   • Interception, tapping (e.g.: worrying disappearance of a
      person (abducted?)
   • Physical observation according to the ‘BOM’ Act.
   • Covert search
   • Data collection by the law enforcement services instead
      of the operators.
            For supposedly more privacy  there is a great risk of
            more intrusion in the people’s privacy
10

Zur nächsten Seite