Sehr geehrter Herr Marjan,
auf Ihre o.g. Anfrage auf Informationszugang teilen wir Ihnen Folgendes mit:
Die von Ihnen genannten Rechtsvorschriften (§ 1 IFG, § 3 UIG, § 1 VIG) sind nicht einschlägig. Die Anwendungsbereiche des Umweltinformationsgesetzes und des Verbraucherinformationsgesetzes sind nicht eröffnet. Das Informationsfreiheitsgesetz ist nicht betroffen, da sich Ihr Antrag nicht auf Zugang zu amtlichen Informationen im Sinne des § 1 Abs.1 S.1 i.V.m. § 2 Nr.1 IFG, sondern auf Antworten auf konkrete Fragestellungen richtet.
Die Beantwortung Ihrer Anfrage erfolgt daher im Wege der allgemeinen Bürgeranfrage. Zu der Plausibilitätskontrolle der PCR-Tests für Sars-CoV-2 verweise ich auf die angefügte Publikation von Christian Drosten, insbesondere auf den Passus:
"Exclusivity of 2019 novel coronavirus based on clinical samples pre-tested positive for other respiratory virusesUsing the E and RdRp gene assays, we tested a total of 297 clinical samples from patients with respiratory disease from the biobanks of five laboratories that provide diagnostic services (one in Germany, two in the Netherlands, one in Hong Kong, one in the UK). We selected 198 samples from three university medical centres where patients from general and intensive care wards as well as mainly paediatric outpatient depart-ments are seen (Germany, the Netherlands, Hong Kong). The remaining samples were contributed by national public health ser vices performing sur veillance studies (RIVM, PHE), with samples mainly submitted by practitioners. The samples contained the broadest range of respiratory agents possible and reflected the general spectrum of virus concentrations encountered in diagnostic laboratories in these countries (Table 2). In total, this testing yielded no false positive outcomes. In four individual test reactions, weak initial reactivity was seen but they were negative upon retesting with the same assay. These signals were not associated with any particular virus, and for each virus with which initial positive reactivity occurred, there were other samples that contained the same virus at a higher con-centration but did not test positive. Given the results from the extensive technical qualification described above, it was concluded that this initial reactivity was not due to chemical instability of real-time PCR probes but most probably to handling issues caused by the rapid introduction of new diagnostic tests and controls during this evaluation study."
Darüber hinaus finden Sie wissenschaftliche Publikationen zu diesem Thema auf
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?holding=iderkilib.
Die Website
https://www.instand-ev.de/ informiert über die Ringversuche, an denen Labore teilnehmen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
